Lonelygirl15

The End.

I'm sorry, BK, but I must disagree with you re: discussing this topic solely in PM.

I edited my comment in the other thread to delete the unfair exaggeration that you pointed out to me, and to keep the comment from detracting from the discussion of my original subject.

But I think it's essential ...

When you say you think she's unable to give consent, you imply that there was some sort of coersion involved. This defines rape.
Honestly, though, my comment wasn't directed at you. I understand your opinion, and you may be right about Bree not being in a state of mind to give consent. My comment ...

I raised this issue in a side comment in the thread entitled "A shipper section." That thread isn't really an appropriate place for the discussion, so I'm starting a new thread here. I think I've raised this issue in the past, but it continues to be a concern.

Over in the other thread, I said the ...

I did mean what I said about the mods' use of OT powers, but that discussion doesn't belong in this thread, so I withdraw the comment and will post a separate thread in the "Concerns and Complaints" section.

Back to the "Separate Shipper Section" discussion already in progress.

Ok, this is the kind of thing I wanted to avoid. I think everyone can appreciate your concerns, but these kinds of accusations getting thrown around in only going to lead to trouble.

What kind of thing, Laurin? What accusations? Were you referring to my post?

If so, I was making no "accusations ...

To show how grateful you are that I'm back, please go over to the "Suggestions" section and support my request for a specific section for all the simpering junior-high-level "Bree-should-totally-hook-up-with-Jonas/Daniel/the Watchers/her mom/whoever" discussions.

Please. :roll: For all our sakes.

Really, removing all of those posts would — in the interest of fairness — require removing all posts like this , this , this , this , this , this , this , or this as being posts that aren't exactly "on topic" in the strictest sense.

Yep. And your problem with that idea is . . . ?

Obviously ...

Thank you, sack! That info clears things up considerably.

And Lurker, I have to disagree with you once again on the Bree issue. I think the girl's pretty screwed up right now, and not in a position to manipulate anybody or to give consent.

Marbella wrote:I hope I'm not still off-base. Let me know!

Not AFAIC, Marbella. In fact . . .

(going back to the story)

"Daniel," Bree purred, her arms around DB's neck, "how would you feel about playing the tambourine in our band?"

I was thinking about how much I agreed that shipping posts were annoying until I got to this part.

We seem to have an inordinate proportion of Shippers on this board -- people who are obsessed with the idea of two specific characters getting into a relationShip ( or one of the characters getting ...

nicole_x wrote:It's Habeas Corpus, luv.

I knew I should have looked it up in the dictionary.

Let this be a lesson to all of you.

Yep. Thanks.

Okay, back to the story . . .

To everyone's utter shock, Daniel was wearing a jetpack, and with Bree in his arms, he shot straight up into the sky and took off toward the setting sun in the West.

Okay, Marbella, you're going to have to go back and fill in the hole.

Did I miss something?