If you go on to link her religion with "purity bond" you find countless mentions of lonelygirl's purity bond to her father. Many religions, one such as Christianity, idealy would like to keep their followers pure/chaste and would rather have them focus on the meaningful bond (agape) to God rather than to one another (eros). But let's be honest, how many people disregard that and find love in any ways (including just kissing) and at any age they possibly can and all this with a religion that preaches us to keep certain urges away mostly because of original sin - free will is seen as an enemy.
Thelema on the other hand is vastly different (besides not being monotheistic) when all it does is preach free will : "Love is the law, love under will", and the statement "Every man and every woman is a star". Thus find your true will and do it under the constraints of the law, whose nature is love.
Thelema is even Greek for "the will"
What I'm poorly trying to get at it is: I think Bree's dad is the one unecessarily always putting her in this situation when all in all, her religion + Daniel really can go together, if it is her choice, if she finds her own path. Just like that former video title "me, religion, and daniel"
Oh yeah and no virgin/purity needed in the following of Thelema:
http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Thelema
Ethics
Thelema stresses
individual liberty balanced by responsibility and discipline, the inherent divinity of every person, regardless of gender , and the
battle against superstition and tyranny. Ultimately, the interpretation of Thelema and The Book of the Law is left to the individual; for this reason, aggressive attempts at conversion are strongly frowned upon, although using personal example to promulgate the Law is encouraged .
Crowley wrote two documents to codify his concept of Thelemic ethics: Oz and Duty.
Liber Oz
Liber Oz establishes the rights of the individual. For each person, these include the right to:
live by one's own law; live in the way that one wills to do; work, play, and rest as one will; die when and how one will; eat and drink what one will; live where one will; move about as one will; think, speak, write, dress,
love, paint, carve (etc.) as one will; and kill those who would thwart these rights. The rights established in Oz are often considered to be complimented by the obligations given in Duty.
Duty
Duty is described as "A note on the chief rules of practical conduct to be observed by those who accept the Law of Thelema." There are four sections:
1. Duty to Self: essentially describes the self as the center of the universe, with a call to learn about one's inner nature. Further, every Thelemite is to develop every faculty in a balanced way, establish one's autonomy, and to learn and do one's True Will.
2. Duty to Others: A Thelemite is called to eliminate the illusion of separateness between oneself and all others, to
fight when necessary, to avoid interfering with the Wills of others, to enlighten others when needed, and to recognize the divine nature of all other beings. Further, it is noble to relieve the suffering of others, but pity (seen as condescending) should be avoided.
3. Duty to Mankind: Thelemites should try to establish the Law of Thelema as the sole basis of conduct. Further, the laws of the land should have the aim of securing the greatest liberty for all individuals. Crime is viewed from the point of view of violating one's True Will ("Thus, murder restricts his right to live; robbery, his right to enjoy the fruits of his labour; coining, his right to the guarantee of the state that he shall barter in security; etc.").
I mean, I guess there might be some purity requirement before a ceremony of some kind but I just can't find anything like that let alone make sense of it with Thelema of all faiths.
As cliche as it is, daddy there is looking more and more like the antagonist over Daniel, atleast to me.
...?
