Could Bree be in Trouble With the Law?

breewithcrackers · Post by **breewithcrackers** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:52 am

It seems that there must have been other witnesses to the shooting and that they would have seen Bree, Jonas and Daniel running from the scene and speeding away in their car...is it possible that the police could come after her too, wrongly suspecting that she was involved in some kind of shooting? (even if no one actually died, she could still be a suspect as an accessory in the attempted murder of her father...)

This could seriously compound her problems...

iamcool · Post by **iamcool** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:54 am

i dont really think getting dragged away by someone is a crime lol

breewithcrackers · Post by **breewithcrackers** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:00 pm

but speeding away in a car and not notifying anyone that there was a shooting is...

iamcool · Post by **iamcool** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:00 pm

how do u know she hasnt?

breewithcrackers · Post by **breewithcrackers** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:02 pm

I don't...but in her older videos she seemed pretty adamant about "not trusting the authorities" because she believed that they were tied to the order, so I assumed she hasn't...

Breepop · Post by **Breepop** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:04 pm

I doubt they'd get police involved (for that reason anyway).

breewithcrackers · Post by **breewithcrackers** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:05 pm

so then if they didn't get the police involved, then they could be suspected as accesories in a shooting, since they fled the scene of the crime without contacting the authorities to alert them that it occured...it's a catch 22

nobackspacebutton · Post by **nobackspacebutton** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:17 pm

She ran for her life. She didn't leave a crime scene.

if someone gets up and shoots your friend...and you run away...

are you fleeing a crimescene or running for your life?

can't go to jail for that.

breewithcrackers · Post by **breewithcrackers** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:23 pm

yes, but she didn't report the crime which means that the police officers don't know whether she was fleeing for her life or fleeing from a crime scene.

if someone highjacks your car with you in it (without anyone knowing) and you get into a car accident and you flee the scene, and don't contact any police station they have NO way of knowing that your car was highjacked or that you were a victim. without your testimony they could just as easily assume that the highjacker was an acquaintance who isn't as fast of a runner as you are and that the two of you were equally culpable in that hit and run.

Breepop · Post by **Breepop** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:27 pm

breewithcrackers wrote:yes, but she didn't report the crime which means that the police officers don't know whether she was fleeing for her life or fleeing from a crime scene.

if someone highjacks your car with you in it (without anyone knowing) and you get into a car accident and you flee the scene, and don't contact any police station they have NO way of knowing that your car was highjacked or that you were a victim. without your testimony they could just as easily assume that the highjacker was an acquaintance who isn't as fast of a runner as you are and that the two of you were equally culpable in that hit and run.

How do you know that she DOESN'T report it? This isn't past tense, it's future tense. We don't know if she will or not.

But I seriously doubt she will.

nobackspacebutton · Post by **nobackspacebutton** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:30 pm

God. I thought your name was breepoop.

anyways, in this case...I don't think the law applies much to the Breeniverse.

Besides, Gemma and Bree both said that there are watchers and people in the order who belong to the police. I doubt they would let her report it anyway.

breewithcrackers · Post by **breewithcrackers** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:32 pm

hehe like the Mafia of the Breeniverse.

annie · Post by **annie** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:38 pm

I think it's an interesting question, though. What if a witness ID-ed Bree and the police insisted on confirming that she wasn't an accessory to the crime... There would be the chance for her to spill her guts about teh Order and end teh cat and mouse game once and for all -- but she wouldn't know if the officers were part of the Order. That twist would have some minor but very good plot tension/suspense.

corley_dear · Post by **corley_dear** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:42 pm

nobackspacebutton wrote:God. I thought your name was breepoop.

anyways, in this case...I don't think the law applies much to the Breeniverse.

Besides, Gemma and Bree both said that there are watchers and people in the order who belong to the police. I doubt they would let her report it anyway.

Exactly! They probably had the whole thing covered up before it even went down. If Bree even tried to report the incident, they'd send her to swim with the fishies.

nobackspacebutton · Post by **nobackspacebutton** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:42 pm

corley_dear wrote:
nobackspacebutton wrote:God. I thought your name was breepoop.

anyways, in this case...I don't think the law applies much to the Breeniverse.

Besides, Gemma and Bree both said that there are watchers and people in the order who belong to the police. I doubt they would let her report it anyway.
Exactly! They probably had the whole thing covered up before it even went down. If Bree even tried to report the incident, they'd send her to swim with the fishies.

She'd definately get cement shoes.

Lonelygirl15

Could Bree be in Trouble With the Law?

Now that Bree has witnessed a possible murder and has run from the scene of the crime, do you think that the police might seek her out?

Could Bree be in Trouble With the Law?