[Puzzle] The Picture 10/02/06
Moderator: Moderators
- Sfonzarelli
- Devoted Fan
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 4:37 am
Guys, making random connections to challices is not going to get us anywhere. The cup is one of the most common images in thelema, and therefore religious traditions, and we could pull hundreds of comparisons out of thin air. (For example, it's one of the four tarot suits.) We have to find out where that specific picture comes from.
I've got a Morse Code anagram for you to decode, Cassie:
-.-. ..-. ..- -.- / ..- -.-- ---
-.-. ..-. ..- -.- / ..- -.-- ---
-
- Suspiciously Absent
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:08 am
Re: Don't know if this is anything
theres nothing. its probably just another poser.JerseyJohnny wrote:I found this website on blogger.com:
http://cassieiswatching.blogspot.com/
It has nothing but an ellipsis (...) at the top, at least that's what I see. I thought maybe some of you more experienced 'net people might know a way to discover hidden text or links? Source code maybe? I don't know.
I'd love to know if this yields anything.
-
- Suspiciously Absent
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:12 am
Hi! I'm a first time poster, loooooooong time lurker, but anyways...
Sorry if this was already posted and/or I'm retarded...
But since the anagrams have been solved, I think there's 1 picture for each anagram, since there's 6 pics and 6 questions, and I think they're read vertically.
1. Who = us, hence mirror reflecting us back to us
2. What = evil priest/religious ceremony, hence picture of cardinal priest guy ETA: I think his face and the book being shopped out shows that who he is specifically and what the book is aren't important.
3. When = 11 days aka Aleister Crowley's b-day, hence the gross birthing baby.
So the picture clues seem kind of vague so it doesn't seem nit-picking them will really yield anything really useful. Possibly the blog one would though, since it would be answering "how." Or I could be completely wrong, but yeah.
Sorry if this was already posted and/or I'm retarded...
But since the anagrams have been solved, I think there's 1 picture for each anagram, since there's 6 pics and 6 questions, and I think they're read vertically.
1. Who = us, hence mirror reflecting us back to us
2. What = evil priest/religious ceremony, hence picture of cardinal priest guy ETA: I think his face and the book being shopped out shows that who he is specifically and what the book is aren't important.
3. When = 11 days aka Aleister Crowley's b-day, hence the gross birthing baby.
So the picture clues seem kind of vague so it doesn't seem nit-picking them will really yield anything really useful. Possibly the blog one would though, since it would be answering "how." Or I could be completely wrong, but yeah.
Last edited by waukifadoo on Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
- NillaWafers
- Enthusiastic Fan
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 2:18 am
- Location: Azusa, CA
- Contact:
-
- Lonely Fan
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 4:42 pm
-
- Casual Observer
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 7:00 pm
- Sfonzarelli
- Devoted Fan
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 4:37 am
And that idea's not at all exclusive to The Da Vinci Code. That's what the "chalice" has symbolized since the beginning of that symbol's popularity.bubbajay424 wrote:Anyone that has read/watched The Da Vinci Code (and I feel your pain if you watched it) knows that "chalice" and refer to a woman, or more specifially, her cup.
I've got a Morse Code anagram for you to decode, Cassie:
-.-. ..-. ..- -.- / ..- -.-- ---
-.-. ..-. ..- -.- / ..- -.-- ---
-
- Casual Observer
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 7:00 pm
That makes sense.waukifadoo wrote:Hi! I'm a first time poster, loooooooong time lurker, but anyways...
Sorry if this was already posted and/or I'm retarded...
But since the anagrams have been solved, I think there's 1 picture for each anagram, since there's 6 pics and 6 questions, and I think they're read vertically.
1. Who = us, hence mirror reflecting us back to us
2. What = evil priest/religious ceremony, hence picture of cardinal priest guy
3. When = 11 days aka Aleister Crowley's b-day, hence the gross birthing baby.
So the picture clues seem kind of vague so it doesn't seem nit-picking them will really yield anything really useful. Possibly the blog one would though, since it would be answering "how." Or I could be completely wrong, but yeah.
So then it would seem that we are not supposed to be finding the exact source of the pictures, just interpreting them. Thats why the blog pic is so unbelievably blurry--because it's not important what blog it is. Although I have no idea what's going on in pic # 5 so that makes it difficult.
Last edited by veriteblesse on Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Lonely Fan
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 4:42 pm
I know it's not exclusive to The Da Vinci Code, but it is VERY mainstream, and a lot of people have consumed it in some manner. I thought I'd reference something not obscureSfonzarelli wrote:And that idea's not at all exclusive to The Da Vinci Code. That's what the "chalice" has symbolized since the beginning of that symbol's popularity.bubbajay424 wrote:Anyone that has read/watched The Da Vinci Code (and I feel your pain if you watched it) knows that "chalice" and refer to a woman, or more specifially, her cup.
cassie is my homegirl
This could be a birthing baby, yes. But, I don't see how.veriteblesse wrote:That makes sense.waukifadoo wrote:Hi! I'm a first time poster, loooooooong time lurker, but anyways...
Sorry if this was already posted and/or I'm retarded...
But since the anagrams have been solved, I think there's 1 picture for each anagram, since there's 6 pics and 6 questions, and I think they're read vertically.
1. Who = us, hence mirror reflecting us back to us
2. What = evil priest/religious ceremony, hence picture of cardinal priest guy
3. When = 11 days aka Aleister Crowley's b-day, hence the gross birthing baby.
So the picture clues seem kind of vague so it doesn't seem nit-picking them will really yield anything really useful. Possibly the blog one would though, since it would be answering "how." Or I could be completely wrong, but yeah.
- Sfonzarelli
- Devoted Fan
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 4:37 am
Except that's EXACTLY what it looks likeleocass86 wrote:This could be a birthing baby, yes. But, I don't see how.veriteblesse wrote:That makes sense.waukifadoo wrote:Hi! I'm a first time poster, loooooooong time lurker, but anyways...
Sorry if this was already posted and/or I'm retarded...
But since the anagrams have been solved, I think there's 1 picture for each anagram, since there's 6 pics and 6 questions, and I think they're read vertically.
1. Who = us, hence mirror reflecting us back to us
2. What = evil priest/religious ceremony, hence picture of cardinal priest guy
3. When = 11 days aka Aleister Crowley's b-day, hence the gross birthing baby.
So the picture clues seem kind of vague so it doesn't seem nit-picking them will really yield anything really useful. Possibly the blog one would though, since it would be answering "how." Or I could be completely wrong, but yeah.
I've got a Morse Code anagram for you to decode, Cassie:
-.-. ..-. ..- -.- / ..- -.-- ---
-.-. ..-. ..- -.- / ..- -.-- ---
-
- Casual Observer
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 7:00 pm
Wait, you don't see how it could be a baby, or you don't see the connection to the how clue?leocass86 wrote:This could be a birthing baby, yes. But, I don't see how.veriteblesse wrote:That makes sense.waukifadoo wrote:Hi! I'm a first time poster, loooooooong time lurker, but anyways...
Sorry if this was already posted and/or I'm retarded...
But since the anagrams have been solved, I think there's 1 picture for each anagram, since there's 6 pics and 6 questions, and I think they're read vertically.
1. Who = us, hence mirror reflecting us back to us
2. What = evil priest/religious ceremony, hence picture of cardinal priest guy
3. When = 11 days aka Aleister Crowley's b-day, hence the gross birthing baby.
So the picture clues seem kind of vague so it doesn't seem nit-picking them will really yield anything really useful. Possibly the blog one would though, since it would be answering "how." Or I could be completely wrong, but yeah.