[Puzzle] The Picture 10/02/06

NillaWafers · Post by **NillaWafers** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:26 am

It's definitely a birhting baby and i think you're on the right track

NillaWafers · Post by **NillaWafers** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:27 am

Also. I'm pretty sure the painting is a Ren Painting...anyone have any ideas?

Dunneh · Post by **Dunneh** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:27 am

waukifadoo wrote: 3. When = 11 days aka Aleister Crowley's b-day, hence the gross birthing baby.

It's not gross! It's nature! Yeah but nature's gross.... XD

Anyway, that's a valid point though.

leocass86 · Post by **leocass86** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:27 am

What baby have you ever seen that is born with that kind of head of hair? It doesn't happen. There's no blood or mess or anything. It doesn't really look like a birthing baby.

and, to add, the size proportions are way off.

NillaWafers · Post by **NillaWafers** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:29 am

Holy crap. There are babys born with a lot of hair, you can even see the pleats of the labia...for goodness sakes. Don't make me post pictures of crowning babies for comparison.

leocass86 · Post by **leocass86** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:29 am

NillaWafers wrote:Holy crap. There are babys born with a lot of hair, you can even see the pleats of the labia...for goodness sakes. Don't make me post pictures of crowning babies for comparison.

Please do, to end this argument.

randomtrickpony · Post by **randomtrickpony** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:30 am

Well...the actual morse code didn't translate out very clean either!

And as an owner of much livestock I can say with all honesty...nature is rather gross sometimes.

So did we get it figured out?

chixor1 · Post by **chixor1** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:30 am

could the painting have something to do with communion?

Sfonzarelli · Post by **Sfonzarelli** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:31 am

chixor1 wrote:could the painting have something to do with communion?

Yes

Dunneh · Post by **Dunneh** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:34 am

leocass86 wrote:What baby have you ever seen that is born with that kind of head of hair? It doesn't happen. There's no blood or mess or anything. It doesn't really look like a birthing baby.

and, to add, the size proportions are way off.

I just looked up 'baby being born' and 'baby births' and found an entry, full head of hear, and very obviously a newborn. Luckily, I hadn't eaten.

EDIT "Crowning baby" works, too. I believe that's exactly what the picture is.

bellamax · Post by **bellamax** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:34 am

waukifadoo wrote: 3. When = 11 days aka Aleister Crowley's b-day, hence the gross birthing baby.

or it could mean a rebirth of Bree. her old self dying ( going back to one of the clues where it says she died) and her new self being reborn. sort of like a baptism in a way? i could be way off but it's just a thought.

NillaWafers · Post by **NillaWafers** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:35 am

You have no idea about birthing. I'm pming you some picture, because of course, they are graphic in nature.

hanrocksit · Post by **hanrocksit** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:35 am

leocass86 wrote:What baby have you ever seen that is born with that kind of head of hair? It doesn't happen. There's no blood or mess or anything. It doesn't really look like a birthing baby.

and, to add, the size proportions are way off.

go to google then type in crowning babies for images.. a pic at the top looks similiar (2nd)

leocass86 · Post by **leocass86** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:35 am

Dunneh wrote:
leocass86 wrote:What baby have you ever seen that is born with that kind of head of hair? It doesn't happen. There's no blood or mess or anything. It doesn't really look like a birthing baby.

and, to add, the size proportions are way off.
I just looked up 'baby being born' and 'baby births' and found an entry, full head of hear, and very obviously a newborn. Luckily, I hadn't eaten.

Not a head of hair like the one we presume is in that image. If these assumptions are correct, that baby is born with as much hair as an adult. You can't even see scalp! Baby's hair is too thin not to show scalp.

veriteblesse · Post by **veriteblesse** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:36 am

leocass86 wrote:
NillaWafers wrote:Holy crap. There are babys born with a lot of hair, you can even see the pleats of the labia...for goodness sakes. Don't make me post pictures of crowning babies for comparison.
Please do, to end this argument.

http://www.gentlebirth.org/archives/bab ... loseup.jpg

my EYES.