[Puzzle] [SOLVED] Solutions to Word Jumbles

mLe · Post by **mLe** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:16 am

Sfonzarelli wrote:
mLe wrote:wondering: now that the threads "solving for morse 'when' etc." are completed, can we close them and maybe open up: "Interpretation of 'when'" and "interpretation of 'where"? I am forum-tarded, but i think some organization might help us keep our thoughts together.
I agree. Close those suckers down, unless we get a blatant hint that we've mistranslated something.

how do we make that happen? (Again, Forum - tarded)

randomtrickpony · Post by **randomtrickpony** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:19 am

Sfonzarelli wrote:
randomtrickpony wrote:Sfonzarelli, is it possible the one line could read: She lied, she cried, she tried, she died? Unless it's set in stone, it references the events so far. She lied about the ceremony, she cried about Daniel, she will be trying the ceremony...and then she will die?
Possibly, but that's assuming we're not dividing the lines in half.

True. I see your point. I just thought it was odd they lined up like that to actual events. Thanks!

Dunneh · Post by **Dunneh** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:20 am

Sfonzarelli wrote:Hey, they pulled up the slack. They only have one line to go.

XD Thanks for cracking that whip!

Sfonzarelli · Post by **Sfonzarelli** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:21 am

mLe wrote:
Sfonzarelli wrote:
mLe wrote:wondering: now that the threads "solving for morse 'when' etc." are completed, can we close them and maybe open up: "Interpretation of 'when'" and "interpretation of 'where"? I am forum-tarded, but i think some organization might help us keep our thoughts together.
I agree. Close those suckers down, unless we get a blatant hint that we've mistranslated something.
how do we make that happen? (Again, Forum - tarded)

We need to wake the moderators up.

randomtrickpony · Post by **randomtrickpony** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:22 am

Sfonzarelli wrote:
mLe wrote:
Sfonzarelli wrote:
mLe wrote:wondering: now that the threads "solving for morse 'when' etc." are completed, can we close them and maybe open up: "Interpretation of 'when'" and "interpretation of 'where"? I am forum-tarded, but i think some organization might help us keep our thoughts together.
I agree. Close those suckers down, unless we get a blatant hint that we've mistranslated something.
how do we make that happen? (Again, Forum - tarded)
We need to wake the moderators up.

Kicks the mods...WAKE UP! ...J/K

mLe · Post by **mLe** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:27 am

randomtrickpony wrote:
Sfonzarelli wrote:
mLe wrote:
Sfonzarelli wrote:
mLe wrote:wondering: now that the threads "solving for morse 'when' etc." are completed, can we close them and maybe open up: "Interpretation of 'when'" and "interpretation of 'where"? I am forum-tarded, but i think some organization might help us keep our thoughts together.
I agree. Close those suckers down, unless we get a blatant hint that we've mistranslated something.
how do we make that happen? (Again, Forum - tarded)
We need to wake the moderators up.
Kicks the mods...WAKE UP! ...J/K

Seems that they close threads when they become meaningless, or when they notice that people are not working on anything cassie related. Can't we open threads though? or can only mods do that? Cause, we don't necessarily have to close the morse threads, we could just open interpretation ones.

Sfonzarelli · Post by **Sfonzarelli** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:28 am

Click the "new topic" button, next to "post reply"

mLe · Post by **mLe** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:36 am

Sfonzarelli wrote:Click the "new topic" button, next to "post reply"

Done. For all three. Now go post stuff.

Or else they're meaningless. And my brain is fried, and I"m a noob at this so i plead with you all... go interpret this nonsense!!

jscolli1 · Post by **jscolli1** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:39 am

I posted this in another thread but it got locked before I got much response, what do you guys think?:

Hey all,
I don't know if this is the right place to post this. But this is my first day on the Cassie Case but I'm really very enthralled with it all. I noticed in one of the decoded poems it says "Up Above you never look" could that be the cliff by the swimming hole from which she dropped the first clue? Has anyone thought of this yet? If so I'm sorry!

Sfonzarelli · Post by **Sfonzarelli** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:01 am

jscolli1 wrote:I posted this in another thread but it got locked before I got much response, what do you guys think?:

Hey all,
I don't know if this is the right place to post this. But this is my first day on the Cassie Case but I'm really very enthralled with it all. I noticed in one of the decoded poems it says "Up Above you never look" could that be the cliff by the swimming hole from which she dropped the first clue? Has anyone thought of this yet? If so I'm sorry!

I'm too tired to post more rap music but the point is this has been suggested before and that's why you've gotten deleted. We have to keep the threads as clean as Felix Ungar's toilet bowls as to make our lives generally easier.

twistofreality · Post by **twistofreality** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:26 am

Anduviel wrote:Do you think that maybe this whole thing with the pic of the vagina and the "make the bed" and the Moonchild reference connects with the video of Bree going to the "doctor's office" for a "chek out" in the latest Daniel's video?

Jeez... those are some pretty intense lines.

And a picture of a vagina? Really?

I fly to Mexico, and everything gets all "Mature Audiences" on me.

Crazy.

S is for Summer · Post by **S is for Summer** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:50 am

This seems a bit far fetched to me, but it occurred to me on reading the poem, so... I'll share?

This option would entail some sort of twisting of time, but...
CiW uses first person when talking about the gate.

Wow, I have no idea how to phrase this well. AH WELL. JUMPS IN.

Could it be that Cassie is somehow trying to reach back to try to prevent her own conception? The poems seem to point to some sort of sexual thang, and some have talked about a moonchild.

Like I said, it might be kind of a stretch, but it's come to mind repeatedly today and I thought it might be good to mention it, as it might spur someone else to an idea.

bosquelito · Post by **bosquelito** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 4:42 am

Food for thought....

"TELL ME TELL ME TELL ME THE ANSWER.
forum members complain for the answers

WHILE YOU BEG IT GROWS LIKE CANCER.
and the forums just grow and grow...

YOU'RE THE ONE WITH EVERY CLUE,
still we have all the clues

BUT FRANK HAS BEEN MORE HELP THAN YOU.
BUT FRANK HAS BEEN HER MAN TO HELP YOU
***not sure***rabbit?***

UP HERE ABOVE YOU NEVER LOOK,
the top of the lonelygirl15.com website

SO ON YOUR HEAD ILL DROP A BOOK."
so here comes the use of the LGPedia

And I know how you guys hate the Donnie Darko references, but....

http://www.stainlesssteelrat.net/ddfaq.htm
"In a nutshell, my favoured explanation is that the Universe has become corrupt and is ending. Donnie (and others) are manipulated by Frank the "rabbit" (and whoever manipulates Frank) to save the Universe."

So.... (and sorry to allow my brain to speak in midthought here) is the manson inclusion a corruption that needs to be set right.

bosquelito · Post by **bosquelito** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 4:45 am

S is for Summer wrote:This seems a bit far fetched to me, but it occurred to me on reading the poem, so... I'll share?

This option would entail some sort of twisting of time, but...
CiW uses first person when talking about the gate.

Wow, I have no idea how to phrase this well. AH WELL. JUMPS IN.

Could it be that Cassie is somehow trying to reach back to try to prevent her own conception? The poems seem to point to some sort of sexual thang, and some have talked about a moonchild.

Like I said, it might be kind of a stretch, but it's come to mind repeatedly today and I thought it might be good to mention it, as it might spur someone else to an idea.

Seriously though, maybe the "corruption" is actually the horrible events that happened to Bree/Cassie. Or "will" happen to Bree/Cassie.

(Maybe Cassie is speaking from the future?)

Maybe that is what is intended to be set right?
... maybe Daniel is supposed to be her first, in a good setting, not a "random" religious ceremony (clinical vs romantic, ok?)