Moderator: Moderators
Bethy is going to love you! Except she would perfer to use 1000 words to say the same thing.DoktorBob wrote:Never thought I'd make a wacky theory but here goes....
OpAPHID, Watchers, and the Order in general.
Maybe there is a division within all ranks instead of just one whole group?
Wackness level 10: Maybe there is an Order War going on to decide what to do with Bree?
Any more wacky theories? List your wacky level next to it.
Well, the thing is, Eli, OpAphid's "minions" sound like Watchers with how they've been described, the OpAPHID videos include the symbol that even Tachyon has said is the symbol of the Watchers, and OpAPHID is without question (at least with all that's been said and shown, including from OpAphid herself) a part of the Order.EliCash wrote:Gemma never said that Watchers are "the Order" in the video "A Watcher!"
This was the first point I ever made in these threads (back in November), when I was making the argument that the Watchers were good guys. Here's what I said:
So please, stop saying Gemma said the Watchers were with the Order. She named that as one of TWO possibilities.Gemma doesn't say they're the Order in "A Watcher." She says that's a possibility OR that "a modern version of them [Knights of the Round Table]." The "modern version" thing is rushed in the video, as if she wants you to miss it, and I didn't notice it until I read the transcript.
I agree Apo it doesn't add up, I think Bree must of been mistaken. My theory is as I mentioned in the thread for the previous video, that it is was the Cowboy, he was dressed in black like Clint Eastwood would be in a similar circumstance, and Bree mistook him for a Watcher.ApotheosisAZ wrote: Daniel told us that Bree said a Watcher shot the Crazy Guy in the desert. It doesn't add up. Watchers don't shoot people. They gather info.
Alone it may not amount to much, I agree, but it's just another thing to add up with the rest.EliCash wrote:I'll take this point by point...
1. "OpAphid's "minions" sound like Watchers with how they've been described."
Are you referring to the "babysitters" terminology? Because I think this is kind of weak and open to interpretation either way.
The symbol does actually exist (it's even on Bree's back). This much we know. Especially since the anti-Order took up the very similar symbol as their banner in opposition to the Order.EliCash wrote:2. "the OpAPHID videos include the symbol that even Tachyon has said is the symbol of the Watchers."
That's the point; Gemma/OpAphid/Order wanted to fool them into not trusting the Watchers. That's why Gemma warned against them (but didn't go so far as to say they were the Order). The fact that the OpAphid videos have that symbol tells us literally nothing -- especially since we don't even know they're really called "Watchers." As a second (and less important) point, that symbol Gemma pretended to find is impossible to see in the video she said she saw it in, so we don't know it really has a connection to the so-called "Watchers."
Again, look at all the pieces together, not seperately.EliCash wrote:3. OpAPHID is without question (at least with all that's been said and shown, including from OpAphid herself) a part of the Order.
Obviously. Nobody ever doubted this.
i meant to address this in my last reply.mincartaugh wrote:"No. Buy it. I don't ... to try it. I rope ... um ...s hot so turn it off."
That's what I hear from Jonas. BTW Is anyone else a bit weirded out by the fact that none of the three are at all concerned with having awakened in the desert with time lost and people shooting at them? They can't even blame the lost time on drink. None of them were drunk when they were abducted.
I miss her. 
