hey
so
somepeople are mods
somepeople don't trust those mods
I want to know the point of referencing something a MOD has said or done in order to validify some aspect of this story.
how are we suppose to just accept that these people are gettin privledged info and still maintain an interest in solving...whatever.
"cassie told (this mod) that (so-and-so cassie) is fake"
c'mon!
have any of the mod's discussed their relationship's to the project? who knows who?
MOD's modus operandi
Moderator: Moderators
None of the mods have any relationship to the project, and as far as I know nobody has ever said, "cassie told (this mod) that (so-and-so cassie) is fake," but if anybody has then they were just confused.
Cassie has posted on her YouTube profile several times to denounce fake Cassie's, and Frank has said in his blog that frankiswaiting@gmail.com is not him, but that's about it.
In general, referencing a mod's opinion on something is only as valuable as referencing the opinion of anybody else on the forum. Some people might assume that a mod is more informed, but we're really not, so we're careful not to state our opinions as fact to avoid exactly that problem.
Cassie has posted on her YouTube profile several times to denounce fake Cassie's, and Frank has said in his blog that frankiswaiting@gmail.com is not him, but that's about it.
In general, referencing a mod's opinion on something is only as valuable as referencing the opinion of anybody else on the forum. Some people might assume that a mod is more informed, but we're really not, so we're careful not to state our opinions as fact to avoid exactly that problem.