gemma = flippin paranoid

plexplex · Post by **plexplex** » Fri Nov 17, 2006 5:07 pm

Okay, WTF?

First of all, the guy by the pool. He "looks" like someone from the fake ceremony?

Unless for some strange reason, the video quality is a WHOLE LOT BETTER in the supposed UK, how the heck can she tell? The quality is so bad and can't point out any distinguishing features. Furthermore, he was on the video for a few microseconds. I didn't even notice him until Gemma pointed him out in her video.

Now, some guy at the grocery store who was ALREADY in the aisle that Daniel happened to be going down has a symbol on his hand. Again, unless the video quality is for whatever reason many times better than what I'm seeing, what in the world is she talking about? The "symbol" looks like a freaking shadow caused by his sleeve.

And again, that guy was on there for split seconds.

And if someone WAS watching Bree and Daniel, why just watch? Why don't they do something? For all the "watchers" know, Bree and Daniel could be in there getting it on all day and there goes their precious, pure sacrifice/whatever.

Sorry if this has been pointed out elsewhere. But galdang. If Gemma was a real person (instead of a character) she would have be freakin obsessive to notice miniscule things.

El.Rubber.Ducky · Post by **El.Rubber.Ducky** » Fri Nov 17, 2006 5:56 pm

Exactly, and how did she even pick it out?
That symbol was soo obscure ((if it even is a symbol)), and I didnt even notice it, and I watch the videos three times over each time in case I miss something.
And there was definatly nothing there.

Morgan · Post by **Morgan** » Sat Nov 18, 2006 12:44 am

Obviously she was right, the guy was outside their room still in the last vid. =d

plexplex · Post by **plexplex** » Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:38 pm

Morgan wrote:Obviously she was right, the guy was outside their room still in the last vid. =d

Not necessarily. The supposed watcher in the grocery store -- you couldn't see his hair.

The guy who was by the pool and smoking outside the window both had blonde hair, but that's the only matching features I could detect. It could've just been another tenant.

trainer101 · Post by **trainer101** » Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:57 pm

Why would anyone think there is only one Watcher?

Ziola · Post by **Ziola** » Sat Nov 18, 2006 8:23 pm

You mean, there could be more?

*looks around nervously*

plexplex · Post by **plexplex** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 12:08 am

Yes, and they all wear the same suits. When observing someone for long periods of time, it is important to wear stylish suits.

GoodGollyItsHolly · Post by **GoodGollyItsHolly** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 12:13 am

My husband dresses rather stylishly each day.. could he be a.. *gasp* Watcher?!?!

trainer101 · Post by **trainer101** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:00 am

GoodGollyItsHolly wrote:My husband dresses rather stylishly each day.. could he be a.. *gasp* Watcher?!?!

Uh oh... Now you're REALLY in trouble!

tayduh1987 · Post by **tayduh1987** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 5:49 pm

I think there is more than one watcher, one of the watcher's in a video looked fatter than the one in the grocery store.

sldsm · Post by **sldsm** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 6:01 pm

tayduh1987 wrote:I think there is more than one watcher, one of the watcher's in a video looked fatter than the one in the grocery store.

And here I thought black was supposed to be slimming, hm.