Page 8 of 39
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 5:23 pm
by The laughing Man
the date isnt new...the pic is tho
the septagram is another connection to aleister crowley
it was used by his inner circle members
tho crowley's was associated with
(7+7)
77+ ___ +77
7
not 666
might coincide with my other post about changing some facts to make thelma or bree's offshoot of it more sinister
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 5:28 pm
by Cu_Roi
I live in Hollywood and I was going to head out to the reservoir...but I'll hold off until we hear back from the group out ther now.
Some of you might want to research ARGs. We've been doing this stuff for a long time and we've learned how to coordinate in the field. Most of all, though, get that sack!!!
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 5:39 pm
by WhivSiv
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 5:46 pm
by Nos
Okay...that page talks about Crowley's mark as being composed of circles that mean different things....And the whole thing meaning 'masculine'....when all in all it looks like a penis to me.
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 5:51 pm
by The Left Side
How do we know that the people searching for the bag aren't part of the production?
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 5:51 pm
by The laughing Man
its suposed to. the symbol is a combination of that mark (masculine) and the star (feminie)
diffrent parts mean diffrent things, like the points of the star representing planets and alchemic metals, but all in all its a combination of both the male and female aspects
its used alot in occult societies, this just happens to be his version of it
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 5:53 pm
by The laughing Man
The Left Side wrote:How do we know that the people searching for the bag aren't part of the production?
regardless if they are or are not, we will still be able to see whats in the bag at some point in the near future
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 5:53 pm
by Nos
Yeah, I know. But it just is funny to me that they would go to the trouble of naming all the different aspects of the picture, when it's just a penis. And having the star with it make it even more dirty...
But I also have weird opinons on AC and Gardner....*shuts up*
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 5:54 pm
by Cu_Roi
Funny...my 1st impression was of an icecream cone...now THAT is disturbing.
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:04 pm
by BoBo
I don't think we're going to hear about that bag. If it's really people in the production crew (which is iffy, to me. I don't know why a person in California would care about the final outcome of a Redskins/Vikings game), we're probably not going to hear from them. If it's a normal person, I don't think they'll find anything.
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:15 pm
by The Left Side
Maybe the people "searching" for the bag will vanish. Then their foootage will turn up a year later.
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:17 pm
by BoBo
And, then everyone will be pissed that this turned into a blair witch rip off.
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:18 pm
by Cu_Roi
BoBo wrote:I don't think we're going to hear about that bag. If it's really people in the production crew (which is iffy, to me. I don't know why a person in California would care about the final outcome of a Redskins/Vikings game), we're probably not going to hear from them. If it's a normal person, I don't think they'll find anything.
Actually that's not how it usually works. Read up a bit.
Here's a good introduction:
http://www.unfiction.com/welcome/
I recommend googling ilovebees or lastcallpoker.
"All of this has happened before...and it will ALL happen again."
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:20 pm
by BoBo
We still aren't sure if this is an ARG or not, though.
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:23 pm
by Cu_Roi
We'll know soon.
This is very promising.