mincartaugh wrote:Oh. And about all this male/female stuff. Have you ever watched a mother of eight kids under the age of 6 hold a conversation with their neighbor? Women are a different species.
I think any parent of eight kids under the age of 6 is probably a different species.
megs229 wrote:Because of the boys current situation, I definately think the next video is going to be funny ( unless in the situation that they get caught again) with the boys waking up next to (well actually on top of) each other like that.
If they can't remember how or why they got there, that would be fucking hilarious.
EternalConfusion wrote:I'm soooo glad Bree is finally likeable again! But she's having a hard time hiding her accent cause I notice it alot.
What's it like exactly? I've never noticed it, even in interviews with Jessica Rose. Maybe I'm used to lots of different accents (some I do notice, like a Japanese or Hispanic accent, or a strong Southern U.S. accent).
mellie3204 wrote:Men vs women: Having studied and subsequently changed courses out of Psych, this went a long way to reaffirming one of the things I HATED about studying it. I did 1st yr Uni Psych in my last year of High School (I tried to Americanise that so you guys could understand, hope I was successful) and changed course once I started Uni because I was totally turned off... this whole extrapolating entire theories of human behaviour from a small case study, and an often unbalanced case study, is one of the BIG reasons...Yay Bree for bringing this problem to people's attention!
You're right about that. Even famous case studies like the Stanford prison experiment and the Milgram experiment only used males (understandable in the prison experiment, but there's not really a good reason why the Milgram didn't) and both had small sample sizes (24 or 26 in the prison, I think, and 40 in the Milgram?).
That said, though, I feel Bree shouldn't be pointing out the flaws in one system while promoting another that's arguably just as flawed (which - even if she hasn't read about dissenting studies - she should consider as possible given what an introspective, emotional guy Jonas has been emphasized as). I mean, if it were stressed that this is just what
Bree thinks, that would be fine, I think. Or even if there was a counterpoint somewhere in the story itself, presented by Daniel or Jonas.
Renegade wrote:This seems to be the general opinion, however, like DoktorBob said: If I woke up in the desert in the middle of a gun fight, I would get drunk afterwards if I had the chance.
I mean, you're all sitting there comfortably at home judging the drinking habits of the two, saying they shouldn't drink because they might be in danger...without taking into account that this constantly being in danger might be exactly the reason they drink.
If you had to think about being abducted or killed every waking moment, and probably dream about it at nights, would you not try to "turn off" your brain as often as you could, just to not have to worry for a few hours?
I am not saying it is healthy, "good" or safe what they're doing - quite the opposite. They're on the verge of alcoholism. What I am saying is: It makes sense. Situations like this, with constant, 24/7 stress, are exactly the reason people start heavy drinking. Just to escape the pressure for a few hours.
I still have to disagree. If anything, their drinking only puts them in more danger, and - not since "Drinking Problems," before it really became as obvious a big problem - we haven't seen them acknowledge this at all. Even Bree is
making excuses for them.
Realistically speaking, the fact that they can't seem to quit - despite knowing how it magnifies the severity of their situation - should make them
more stressed out. Realistically, they should actually be seen struggling to pop the top off a bottle, even if they eventually gave in. So far we've seen them approach getting loaded with reckless abandon. An almost devil may care attitude that would suggest they think the Order will play nice and not kidnap a drunk guy.
I still think their behavior is extremely unrealistic. Also, everyone, please be aware once again that I'm not saying it's unrealistic for 19-year-old guys to go get drunk and stumble around laughing like buffoons afterward. I see guys who remind me of this weekly. That's a fairly large number of your college crowd right there, actually.
However, to the best of my knowledge, not one of those guys has the new world order chasing them across the planet with the Eye of Providence hot on their heels the whole way. Different expectations tend to apply based on varying circumstances.
Renagade wrote:And, other than in the real world, it's at least fun to watch here.
Yeah, this is true. Damn hilarious in fact.
Languorous Lass wrote:When she's under stress, my GF withdraws. And lately when I'm stressed, I've had a tendency to react as if I were Godzilla and the rest of the world was Tokyo.
Mine withdraws while I just want to talk. If that makes me a woman, so be it. That's the only way I ever want to deal with stress.
Languorous Lass wrote:longlostposter wrote:Lurker, I think the difference is that men are raised to suppress their feelings, and women are not.
Except in cases when men are not raised to suppress their feelings, and women are.
This is one of my huge soapbox issues. All of this "Men are X, and women are Y" crap is just that -- crap. Some women fit the stereotypes, some do not. Same for men.
I think Juli is correct in general. I don't think she was using "raised" in individual terms, but in societal ones. If we're looking at western societies, at least, there is a mythology that males do not - perhaps should not - show emotions, while women do so.
It's retarded, yes, but it's there - and many people are convinced of it. Even our sitcoms promote the idea as though it's a fact of life.
Languorous Lass wrote: ... the insistence on falsely polarizing gender-related characteristics causes serious damage to people who don't happen to fit the stereotypical norms. We're talking not only psychic damage (of which there is plenty), but
employment discrimination and serious physical assault.
It happens that I was reading a bunch of materials on this issue just yesterday.
This report ,
59 Under 30, lists 50 cases of young people under 30 who were murdered in the past ten-or-so years because they didn't fit gender stereotypes. To quote from the report: "Few of us realize just how many young people are dying violently each year simply because they don't fit someone's ideal for masculinity and femininity. Yet if federal law mandated the FBI to track genderbased hate crimes, they would outweigh every other category except race."
In other words, this stuff is serious.
I'm glad you brought this up. I had thought about it, but felt like I'd pushed the issue far enough already.