0075 "Man in the Suit"

Kasdeja · Post by **Kasdeja** » Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:50 pm

trainer101 wrote:
Kasdeja wrote:trainer and Inigo were inhere when it happened...well, I don't know if trainer actually saw the original post, but he at least saw the edited one before it was stolen. But Inigo and I were talking when it happened. Unfortunately it happned before cup of coffee #2.
I did not see the original post, unfortunately. All I was able to capture was the smirky face after the edit. Has anyone checked the rest of the forums to see what posts were made immediately afterwards and by who? Maybe we can narrow it down.

Another mystery!

Tribute.

Inigo · Post by **Inigo** » Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:53 pm

I think it's an older an better known fan. Isn't tribute a newbie?

Kasdeja · Post by **Kasdeja** » Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:54 pm

Tribute posted their first post in whichever thread was directly beneath this one...right after the LG15 post happened...and then immediately posted inhere...and then disappeared.

Inigo · Post by **Inigo** » Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:03 pm

Argh I should be studying right now but I just can't concentrate. Being an eyewitness to this strange post is intriguing

I hope we get to the bottom of it.

omegawoman · Post by **omegawoman** » Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:13 pm

thejyav wrote:
omegawoman wrote:
Sh*t- whal else are you going to do when you are holed up in a motel room for days on end with an attractive member of the opposite sex? You have to pass the time somehow.
was not arguing with you was just pointing out why people might hae been going down that road on what your signature meant.

Not arguing either, and I admit, I was being a little perverted. Just trying to have a little fun since we really can't pick apart this video.

thejyav · Post by **thejyav** » Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:17 pm

did everyone see the new message bree posted, basically defending agasint everything we have been complaing about?

thejyav · Post by **thejyav** » Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:18 pm

omegawoman wrote:
Not arguing either, and I admit, I was being a little perverted. Just trying to have a little fun since we really can't pick apart this video.

nothing wrong with a little fun

Wisi Girl · Post by **Wisi Girl** » Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:23 pm

I suppose you can't ever be sure about who is who in this forum......Usually it would be those who don't display an emotional attachment such as, "Oh my gosh, Thor is in this video! I love him! Aw, Bree is so funny! I just can't leave my computer right now because I have to figure all of this out!" This wouldn't be correct. Also, it wouldn't be someone who is a "devoted fan" or who posts A LOT in this forum because these sort of people have created friendships via this site and are well known among this community. And, the person may have bits of insightful input but would, for the most part, remain objective. After all, their presence is to witness our feedback and, perhaps carefully guide us in one direction or another.

So......Who fits that discription here?

silvermoon · Post by **silvermoon** » Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:26 pm

OK, I admit it. I'm a plant.

A nice fern in fact.

trainer101 · Post by **trainer101** » Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:27 pm

thejyav wrote:did everyone see the new message bree posted, basically defending agasint everything we have been complaing about?

lonelygirl15 wrote:A lot of people have written to us saying we should be doing more to resolve our situation. But you need to remember that I've never been in this position before so I'm not really sure what the answer is.

I think that's our cue to go ahead and figure this out for her. I just don't know what more there is that we haven't already gone over, unless the idea is for us to put it all together into a cohesive theory. THAT will be a challenge.

ericski · Post by **ericski** » Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:33 pm

the thing about "plants" doesn't to matter to me. what difference would it make who says what and why?

hey trainer, that actually makes a lot of sense, and not just for this instance. maybe the whole premise now is for us to come up with a good idea for going forward, that doesn't include the cops. we said we wanted to see them take off, and they did. we said we wanted to see them post from the road, now they're waiting for consensus on what should happen next, that will work within the given parameters.

Wisi Girl · Post by **Wisi Girl** » Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:41 pm

Eh, forget it. I was trying to imply that I could be one but I suppose nobody connected that together. I sort of do fit the profile but....Heh. Not me. In any case, if we are ever in doubt about something we can just ask trainer101. Yeah.....I think that will pretty much solve everything.

omegawoman · Post by **omegawoman** » Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:44 pm

ericski wrote:the thing about "plants" doesn't to matter to me. what difference would it make who says what and why?

hey trainer, that actually makes a lot of sense, and not just for this instance. maybe the whole premise now is for us to come up with a good idea for going forward, that doesn't include the cops. we said we wanted to see them take off, and they did. we said we wanted to see them post from the road, now they're waiting for consensus on what should happen next, that will work within the given parameters.

I think they should go stake out Lucy's house, in disguise, possilbly in another car so they won't be spotted.
I can't really think of any other suggestions they can do that doesn't involve the authorities. I do think, however, they are not going to find anything out just sitting in the room.
I don't know if it would be safe for them to go search Bree's house, but if they somehow could get back there, they may find more clues. Maybe other things were left for Bree other than a note and money. Or maybe Lucy and Deacon guy dropped something that could give more information about where Bree's parents are.

Wisi Girl · Post by **Wisi Girl** » Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:47 pm

ericski wrote:the thing about "plants" doesn't to matter to me. what difference would it make who says what and why?

hey trainer, that actually makes a lot of sense, and not just for this instance. maybe the whole premise now is for us to come up with a good idea for going forward, that doesn't include the cops. we said we wanted to see them take off, and they did. we said we wanted to see them post from the road, now they're waiting for consensus on what should happen next, that will work within the given parameters.

Wait, so this is not right. I understand that this new form of entertainment is meant to be interactive. I get that. I enjoy it, too. However, we shouldn't determine the story line, even if we may have some influence in the actual content of the videos. It's nice to see Gemma substantiate our concerns about the man in the suit by the pool. It's great to see Bree addressing our theory of the room/ her possessions being bugged. However, the foundational plot of LG15 should have been decided on a long time ago. If we affect that, then these CREATORS are not actually CREATING anything but merely plugging in random ideas from fans.

ericski · Post by **ericski** » Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:52 pm

wisigirl, the creator concept you bring up has a philosophical aspect to it; does a creator bring a universe into being and then let it operate under free will?