Lonelygirl15

Or her sister

Kasdeja wrote:Or her sister

Not that would be an interesting turn of events.

nobackspacebutton wrote:oddly enough..that would make sense.

wouldn't it make sense...
and brother be frank?

I seem to have been debunked by Op on this one.

You're walking crooked dear. Have you tried a V8?

blessedSophia wrote:

> Couldn't help but notice what looks like a startling resemblance between two redheads: http://lonelygirl15.com/forum/viewtopic ... 2099#82099
>
> Any validity to this observation, or am I "tilting at windmills" again?
>
> Cheers,
> Sophia

blessedsophia wrote:I seem to have been debunked by Op on this one.

You're walking crooked dear. Have you tried a V8?

blessedSophia wrote:

> Couldn't help but notice what looks like a startling resemblance between two redheads: http://lonelygirl15.com/forum/viewtopic ... 2099#82099
>
> Any validity to this observation, or am I "tilting at windmills" again?
>
> Cheers,
> Sophia

I used to love those commercials as a kid. Gotta love Op's vast pop-culture knowledge.

And Op has stated in the past that Tach uses actresses in her videos.

JenniPowell wrote:

blessedsophia wrote:I seem to have been debunked by Op on this one.

You're walking crooked dear. Have you tried a V8?

blessedSophia wrote:

> Couldn't help but notice what looks like a startling resemblance between two redheads: http://lonelygirl15.com/forum/viewtopic ... 2099#82099
>
> Any validity to this observation, or am I "tilting at windmills" again?
>
> Cheers,
> Sophia

I used to love those commercials as a kid. Gotta love Op's vast pop-culture knowledge.

And Op has stated in the past that Tach uses actresses in her videos.

Where did Op say that Tach uses actresses? I don't remember seeing that and I'm trying to get a little more organized with my thought processes. If they are actresses, I don't have to worry about examining every facial feature (which would be nice)

Op has said the woman in the vids is NOT Tach.

blessedsophia wrote: The caps:



Thoughts?

They look completely different to me. The brow ridge just above the eyelids are the giveaway. The brow ridge is much thicker and more pronounced in the first capture and hangs over the eyelid on the right, but far more shallow and less pronounced in the second capture, which is why you can see so much of the eyelid in the second capture but not in the first. Completely different bone structure.

if you look though.... it could just be the position of the eyes that causes the diffrence we see????

Just because Op said no doesn't mean its not true...

think about I=infiltrate.

tons of people asked her about infiltrate

it definately makes sense though that Tach would be Cassie, shes been on the run, and we dont know for how long. If you guys dont mind me asking whos Frank

Cassie is an agent in The Culper Ring?

OpAphid has even said herself, "Are you expecting me to ring a bell if you say the right answer." (Or something like that.)

So if Op says "No." it means "Maybe."

I still think Tach is the girl Gemma talks about in "They Disappeared."

I think that maybe the girl from Tach's video "Mysteries of My Past..." is the girl from Op's video. But I don't think Tach uses the same girl in all of her videos the since the eyes and hair are different. I also think that Op might have used a completely different person or I think she could have used Tach's past videos that were deleted.