[YouTube] Ignore future phone calls

SharpDressedMan · Post by **SharpDressedMan** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:03 pm

The mailbox is already full so it didn't play the message. Or whatever, I just got the "the mail for 213..... is full and cannot accept new messages" so either the OGM already got cleared or i can't hear it.

brandoblues · Post by **brandoblues** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:25 pm

poor cassie, since we have nothing new, and if they are working on ways to continue the story with no ways of being jacked, it could take a while.

on another note, poor unforums, they didnt deserve this.

lgxy · Post by **lgxy** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:58 pm

twjaniak wrote:
ravensgrace wrote:
smithereens wrote:I got it, too. Definitely don't trust the phone. With the new LG15 video out, I'm sure we'll get a clue very soon.
We haven't even figured out the results of the first clue yet, so why are we looking towards the next one already? Does any of this seem logical?
I think that since the phone aspect of Cassie's last clue has been compromised, she is abandoning her last effort. However, I expect to see more of the Bible.

I'm 100% sure that the voice mails are all on track. The audio editing is very similar to the first video and they have a lot of the same style/themes through out. Knowing this, the definition of "fake" coming from cassie is almost like an inside joke between me and her now.

NillaWafers · Post by **NillaWafers** » Thu Sep 21, 2006 1:21 am

I kinda believe that it could be the storyline....the clue jacking and stuff. She could be alive, and in hiding, with people looking for her...and these are the people who are trying to distort and change her clues...make sure she is not heard.

juliangrimm · Post by **juliangrimm** » Thu Sep 21, 2006 1:27 am

I'm pretty much convinced that's the case. I think that if we get to ignoring too much then we'll miss something important. I'm sure there was a reason for the calls and phone messages that were left and not someone gamejacking.

NillaWafers · Post by **NillaWafers** » Thu Sep 21, 2006 1:39 am

I have a hard time believing that a gamejacker could hack into someone's phone. I mean, they'd have to access to the phone at least wouldn't they? How would on get cassie's phone?

sunflowernik · Post by **sunflowernik** » Thu Sep 21, 2006 2:00 am

This "game jacker" is starting to look cleverer and more intereseting than the actual game.

jppuertorico85 · Post by **jppuertorico85** » Thu Sep 21, 2006 2:05 am

i dont believe the whole game jacker theory, if we are supposed to believe cassie ab that then we're supposed to accept that she let her phone get jacked not once but 3 times i believe...after the 1st helter skelter message which she denied, the 2nd message which was the loveline interview, and earlier today again there was a backwards song/message i believe it was helter skelter again not sure, but anyways--THREE times she was jacked? If you knew you truly had your phone hacked into the 1st time, how could u let it happen 2 more times, and by the same game jacking entity because they kept putting hi-tech messages, it wasn't 3 random goofballs just tryin 2 have a good time. It doesn't add up to me!

Post by **wintermute** » Thu Sep 21, 2006 10:54 am

NillaWafers wrote:I have a hard time believing that a gamejacker could hack into someone's phone. I mean, they'd have to access to the phone at least wouldn't they? How would on get cassie's phone?

Nah... It would be fairly trivial to do for someone with the time and resources. But I'm still torn as to whether it's in-game or not...

TehSpectre · Post by **TehSpectre** » Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:04 am

wintermute wrote:
NillaWafers wrote:I have a hard time believing that a gamejacker could hack into someone's phone. I mean, they'd have to access to the phone at least wouldn't they? How would on get cassie's phone?
Nah... It would be fairly trivial to do for someone with the time and resources. But I'm still torn as to whether it's in-game or not...

I think that is what they are going for.

Post by **wintermute** » Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:52 am

TehSpectre wrote:I think that is what they are going for.

Which is purely genius either way.

'mute

clarrisa · Post by **clarrisa** » Thu Sep 21, 2006 12:32 pm

BuncyTheFrog wrote: so much for me being special... She didn't give me that message. But yeah, I really suspected THAT to be false as well. It's too much unlike her to post something like that.

Maybe she saw the video where you jumped on the hysteria bandwagon and were "out" of all this. She has proven to offend easily.

alexisme · Post by **alexisme** » Thu Sep 28, 2006 4:52 pm

so how long has cassie's phone been turned off?

Post by **wintermute** » Thu Sep 28, 2006 5:47 pm

alexisme wrote:so how long has cassie's phone been turned off?

Probably a day or two after I quit lurking and started posting here... So almost a week?

'mute

alysaface · Post by **alysaface** » Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:36 pm

ok i'm very new here, and i'm new to all of this. but i'm a big fan of crime-type detective stories, and i just thought of something.. and i know it's late, but whatever.. let's see if i can explain myself well enough, haha. i really suck at that..

anywho,

it's possible to i suppose "hack" into someones phone, and have that particular number activated to someone elses phone. so that would sort of explain the callbacks, except how did they get the numbers that called her? did they also hack into the sent/recieved calls part of the cell phone bill?

am i just retarded?

sorry.