Page 2 of 3
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 7:51 pm
by cbizzle44
i never liked jules until now
i'm freaking out over here. this is how i reacted when i first watched the cassie videos. holy shit.
it looks like either "saw me" or "savv me" (the vv and w are quite similar, no?). but my vote is for savv me, because that looks like "save me", which looks like a plea for help! i am so excited. TAAG to the rescue!
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 8:45 pm
by Lurker
cbizzle44 wrote:i am so excited. TAAG to the rescue!
Er ... has anyone actually told them? I think I'm going to go inform Bree.
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 8:51 pm
by RockinDuckie558
Lurker wrote:cbizzle44 wrote:i am so excited. TAAG to the rescue!
Er ... has anyone actually told them? I think I'm going to go inform Bree.
Good idea. I just sent a message to Jules asking if she was involved with the Hymn of One. Hopefully I'll get a response.
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:06 pm
by onsweetavenue
the first thing that came to mind was anagram.
if it was Saw Me it could be "was me" as in "I was almost the new girl".
but whatev:)
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:18 pm
by teambree
i am 100% hoping for "save me"
most definately thinking that the second word is me... first word for sure starts with sa.... one can only hope it's save me then bring out the new tachy influenced breeeeeeee!
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:43 pm
by Susan
Has anyone figured out how one young girl can have plastered SAVV ME on a hillside?
Also, I take it then that this group isn't interested in partaking in our little experiment. N'est Pas?
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:46 pm
by Lurker
Susan wrote:Has anyone figured out how one young girl can have plastered SAVV ME on a hillside?
In Photoshop or Paint. She wouldn't have actually done it.
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:46 pm
by onsweetavenue
I assumed she just plastered saw me on a picture of a hillside with photoshop.
it looks like she used embossed text, though i could be wrong.
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:50 pm
by Susan
Then made it really dark so nobody would notice. Yeah, yeah, that makes sense... then sent it to somebody totally unconnected with the lg15 people. OK, ok. And spelled it wrong so it would take a while to comprehend....
Nope. Not buying it.
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:42 pm
by onsweetavenue
Susan wrote:Then made it really dark so nobody would notice. Yeah, yeah, that makes sense... then sent it to somebody totally unconnected with the lg15 people. OK, ok. And spelled it wrong so it would take a while to comprehend....
Nope. Not buying it.
And what makes more sense is that she went to a hillside, spent time making it herself, then drove out far far far away to get a very unclear picture of it?
yeah, okay, makes sense.
Maybe it's a code meant to be subtle. Like everything else in LG15. So only the right people will be able to decode it. Like everything else.
Who did she send it to who was unrelated to LG15? She responded by sending it to someone who asked if she was the new girl - that is basically like giving a hint for the storyline. But I think I missed who else she gave it out to - I'm not sure.
And what did she spell wrong?
We don't know if SAVV ME was misspelled or it is a code. We also don't know if its SAVV ME. It could be SAW ME or it something else. Too blurry to tell.
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 12:42 am
by Susan
onsweetavenue wrote:Susan wrote:Then made it really dark so nobody would notice. Yeah, yeah, that makes sense... then sent it to somebody totally unconnected with the lg15 people. OK, ok. And spelled it wrong so it would take a while to comprehend....
Nope. Not buying it.
And what makes more sense is that she went to a hillside, spent time making it herself, then drove out far far far away to get a very unclear picture of it?
yeah, okay, makes sense.
Maybe it's a code meant to be subtle. Like everything else in LG15. So only the right people will be able to decode it. Like everything else.
Who did she send it to who was unrelated to LG15? She responded by sending it to someone who asked if she was the new girl - that is basically like giving a hint for the storyline. But I think I missed who else she gave it out to - I'm not sure.
And what did she spell wrong?
We don't know if SAVV ME was misspelled or it is a code. We also don't know if its SAVV ME. It could be SAW ME or it something else. Too blurry to tell.
Missed my point. I'm saying it was a newbee posting on a forum he was unfamiliar with, making up a story so he could play along. I've played with many pre-teens who pull this kind of stunt lots.
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 12:50 am
by robtomorrow
Susan wrote:Missed my point. I'm saying it was a newbee posting on a forum he was unfamiliar with, making up a story so he could play along. I've played with many pre-teens who pull this kind of stunt lots.
Yes it seems a little suspicious that the first post this person made was to post this picture.
and he/she hasn't posted anything since, one post that's it.
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 1:10 am
by frankenstein girl
Yeah.. and I don't think that -the new girl- would be sending people coded messages. To ask someone who hasn't even acknowledged the existence of Bree (and has been ignoring Bree's questions) if she's -the new girl-, I highly doubt she'd be giving out coded messages. And who says that the new girl even knows that she's the new girl? If they've even told her that she's been chosen to do the ceremony, what are the chances that she would even know that she is replacing someone else who refused to do it?
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 1:27 am
by Anth2020
Can you please tell AT LEAST ME what was EXACTLY in that message
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 1:45 am
by Lurker
robtomorrow wrote:Susan wrote:Missed my point. I'm saying it was a newbee posting on a forum he was unfamiliar with, making up a story so he could play along. I've played with many pre-teens who pull this kind of stunt lots.
Yes it seems a little suspicious that the first post this person made was to post this picture.
and he/she hasn't posted anything since, one post that's it.
Good points all. The fact that Bree
didn't acknowledge it when she was posting in her section earlier suggests to me that this is bogus.