IMPORTANT DOCUMENT - PLEASE HELP!!!

bucktooth · Post by **bucktooth** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:59 pm

Agreed on the recent "defunctual" --> "ineffectual" consensus

Looking at ____ Reference Points, at first I thought "Bay Society" but there's too much space. It looks like the first letter of that line could also be an "F" if not a "P"

SivartAlappes · Post by **SivartAlappes** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:59 pm

Aponi wrote:
kellylen wrote:
tazman2087 wrote:kellylen
see i was on track with replicate.
lololol yeah i see

and its copy guys.

like i said. things in science having to do with biochemistry and genetics DO NOT BLEND!
I am back! I needed food.
I agree with copy, it makes sense.
But it's NOT block.
you cannot block it because the complimenatary strand of RNA won't combine?
If it won't combine it's already being blocked. So 'you' don't need to block it.
Maybe its something else that begins with bl?
I'm just saying, block makes no sense in context.

Thankyou Aponi!!!!!

Aponi · Post by **Aponi** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:59 pm

Samara wrote:
the word regular under Given Facts 2) does not fit
Yeah, that's why I'm not so sure that's the word that belongs there. I'm still working on it.

Yeah when I originally posted that it had a question mark. It doesn't make sense to say that this mutation is regular, all evidence points the other way. However, it could very well be regularly changing, i'm pretty sure some mutations work that way. It's just the context of the mutation, I don't think any of us would know if it's regular or not unless we studied it.

Does that make sense?

tazman2087 · Post by **tazman2087** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:00 pm

'Block' does make sense if you can only block DNA or the combined RNA.

kellylen · Post by **kellylen** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:00 pm

changed to ineffectual and regulatory

kellylen · Post by **kellylen** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:01 pm

tazman2087 wrote:'Block' does make sense if you can only block DNA or the combined RNA.

change combine to copy and it makes sense

SivartAlappes · Post by **SivartAlappes** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:01 pm

a_little_nachtmusik wrote:
emerrs11 wrote:the ____________ reference points i thought could be retrivial
It's Bree Solution Reverence Points, I'm pretty sure.

NO it's not! First off, the first letter of the blank is more likely a P (though I'll give you benefit of the doubt and say it MIGHT be a B). BUT, the last letter of the blank is so obviously a "t" that "solution" CAN NOT be the accurate word.

emerrs11 · Post by **emerrs11** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:02 pm

kellylen wrote:change combine to copy guys and it makes a lot more sense.

you are arguing about osmething i changed a half hour to hour ago XD

I agree. Copy makes a lot of sense. Much more than combine.

bucktooth · Post by **bucktooth** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:02 pm

regressive?
not enough room for "regenerating"
definitely looks like "reg*" to me, though

Samara · Post by **Samara** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:03 pm

Oh, I give up. Too many cooks in the kitchen.....as it were.

SivartAlappes · Post by **SivartAlappes** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:03 pm

kellylen wrote:change combine to copy guys and it makes a lot more sense.

you are arguing about osmething i changed a half hour to hour ago XD

The word "activity" should ALSO be changed to "copy"

Aponi · Post by **Aponi** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:04 pm

SivartAlappes wrote:
a_little_nachtmusik wrote:
emerrs11 wrote:the ____________ reference points i thought could be retrivial
It's Bree Solution Reverence Points, I'm pretty sure.

NO it's not! First off, the first letter of the blank is more likely a P (though I'll give you benefit of the doubt and say it MIGHT be a B). BUT, the last letter of the blank is so obviously a "t" that "solution" CAN NOT be the accurate word.

I REALLY don't think its 'Bree'. It doesn't look like Bree. As I said, the last letter looks like a lowercase G (g).

And i'm done with block/blend whatever.
Can we get a update on this page Kelly? Cause I doon't want to scroll back and find which one is the most current lol

tazman2087 · Post by **tazman2087** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:04 pm

yeah copy makes more sense because the smear is too short for "combine"

SivartAlappes · Post by **SivartAlappes** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:07 pm

emerrs11 wrote:
kellylen wrote:change combine to copy guys and it makes a lot more sense.

you are arguing about osmething i changed a half hour to hour ago XD
I agree. Copy makes a lot of sense. Much more than combine.

Which, if you guys will recall (but of course you won't, since as Kelly pointed out, I'm a Travis) I was the first person to say they were "copy".. this was back on page 6 or 7 I believe.

ohpete · Post by **ohpete** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:07 pm

okay guys. heres the parts im not sure of:

3) A non-functioning mutated (?) ribozyme exists and manifests differently in every Hymn of One girl.
4) This portion still functions but you cannot block it because the complimentary strands of RNA won't copy.

3) Q.E.D. strand will bind to ribozyme and occlude its activity (?).

______ Reference Points
The steps concerning ribozyme function
RNAse P related -tRNA cleavage
Splicosome related - intron/exon splicing
Hammerhead or Telomerase(?) related - telomere synthesis
GlmS ribozyme related - fructose 6-phosphate pathway

whats everyones standpoint on those?