Page 12 of 18
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:59 pm
by bucktooth
Agreed on the recent "defunctual" --> "ineffectual" consensus
Looking at ____ Reference Points, at first I thought "Bay Society" but there's too much space. It looks like the first letter of that line could also be an "F" if not a "P"
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:59 pm
by SivartAlappes
Aponi wrote:kellylen wrote:tazman2087 wrote:kellylen
see i was on track with replicate.
lololol yeah i see
and its copy guys.
like i said. things in science having to do with biochemistry and genetics DO NOT BLEND!
I am back! I needed food.
I agree with copy, it makes sense.
But it's NOT block.
you cannot block it because the complimenatary strand of RNA won't combine?
If it won't combine it's already being blocked. So 'you' don't need to block it.
Maybe its something else that begins with bl?
I'm just saying, block makes no sense in context.
Thankyou Aponi!!!!!
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:59 pm
by Aponi
Samara wrote:the word regular under Given Facts 2) does not fit
Yeah, that's why I'm not so sure that's the word that belongs there. I'm still working on it.
Yeah when I originally posted that it had a question mark. It doesn't make sense to say that this mutation is regular, all evidence points the other way. However, it could very well be regularly changing, i'm pretty sure some mutations work that way. It's just the context of the mutation, I don't think any of us would know if it's regular or not unless we studied it.
Does that make sense?
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:00 pm
by tazman2087
'Block' does make sense if you can only block DNA or the combined RNA.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:00 pm
by kellylen
changed to ineffectual and regulatory
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:01 pm
by kellylen
tazman2087 wrote:'Block' does make sense if you can only block DNA or the combined RNA.
change combine to copy and it makes sense
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:01 pm
by SivartAlappes
a_little_nachtmusik wrote:emerrs11 wrote:the ____________ reference points i thought could be retrivial
It's Bree Solution Reverence Points, I'm pretty sure.
NO it's not! First off, the first letter of the blank is more likely a P (though I'll give you benefit of the doubt and say it MIGHT be a B). BUT, the last letter of the blank is so obviously a "t" that "solution" CAN NOT be the accurate word.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:02 pm
by emerrs11
kellylen wrote:change combine to copy guys and it makes a lot more sense.
you are arguing about osmething i changed a half hour to hour ago XD
I agree. Copy makes a lot of sense. Much more than combine.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:02 pm
by bucktooth
regressive?
not enough room for "regenerating"
definitely looks like "reg*" to me, though
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:03 pm
by Samara
Oh, I give up. Too many cooks in the kitchen.....as it were.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:03 pm
by SivartAlappes
kellylen wrote:change combine to copy guys and it makes a lot more sense.
you are arguing about osmething i changed a half hour to hour ago XD
The word "activity" should ALSO be changed to "copy"
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:04 pm
by Aponi
SivartAlappes wrote:a_little_nachtmusik wrote:emerrs11 wrote:the ____________ reference points i thought could be retrivial
It's Bree Solution Reverence Points, I'm pretty sure.
NO it's not! First off, the first letter of the blank is more likely a P (though I'll give you benefit of the doubt and say it MIGHT be a B). BUT, the last letter of the blank is so obviously a "t" that "solution" CAN NOT be the accurate word.
I REALLY don't think its 'Bree'. It doesn't look like Bree. As I said, the last letter looks like a lowercase G (g).
And i'm done with block/blend whatever.
Can we get a update on this page Kelly? Cause I doon't want to scroll back and find which one is the most current lol
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:04 pm
by tazman2087
yeah copy makes more sense because the smear is too short for "combine"
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:07 pm
by SivartAlappes
emerrs11 wrote:kellylen wrote:change combine to copy guys and it makes a lot more sense.
you are arguing about osmething i changed a half hour to hour ago XD
I agree. Copy makes a lot of sense. Much more than combine.
Which, if you guys will recall (but of course you won't, since as Kelly pointed out, I'm a Travis) I was the first person to say they were "copy".. this was back on page 6 or 7 I believe.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:07 pm
by ohpete
okay guys. heres the parts im not sure of:
3) A non-functioning mutated (?) ribozyme exists and manifests differently in every Hymn of One girl.
4) This portion still functions but you cannot block it because the complimentary strands of RNA won't copy.
3) Q.E.D. strand will bind to ribozyme and occlude its activity (?).
______ Reference Points
The steps concerning ribozyme function
RNAse P related -tRNA cleavage
Splicosome related - intron/exon splicing
Hammerhead or Telomerase(?) related - telomere synthesis
GlmS ribozyme related - fructose 6-phosphate pathway
whats everyones standpoint on those?