Lonelistic Physics: Why there are no plot holes.

kellylen · Post by **kellylen** » Mon Jul 02, 2007 9:07 pm

ghost_of_kenny wrote:I'd like to welcome our newest member:

Dr. Kelly Len - Dr. Kenny Elendi's Personal Research Assistant

and personal sex slave but thats a secret

ghost_of_kenny · Post by **ghost_of_kenny** » Mon Jul 02, 2007 9:14 pm

kellylen wrote:
ghost_of_kenny wrote:I'd like to welcome our newest member:

Dr. Kelly Len - Dr. Kenny Elendi's Personal Research Assistant
and personal sex slave but thats a secret

I...uh...well...you see...I just...err....Dr. Len...I need you in my office. Now.

Spades · Post by **Spades** » Mon Jul 02, 2007 9:50 pm

ghost_of_kenny wrote:
kellylen wrote:
ghost_of_kenny wrote:I'd like to welcome our newest member:

Dr. Kelly Len - Dr. Kenny Elendi's Personal Research Assistant
and personal sex slave but thats a secret
I...uh...well...you see...I just...err....Dr. Len...I need you in my office. Now.

I love this forum.

ghost_of_kenny · Post by **ghost_of_kenny** » Mon Jul 02, 2007 10:05 pm

Also I would like to welcome Dr Steve Medigod as our staff biologist.

Onewen · Post by **Onewen** » Mon Jul 02, 2007 10:09 pm

Spades wrote:
ghost_of_kenny wrote:
kellylen wrote: and personal sex slave but thats a secret
I...uh...well...you see...I just...err....Dr. Len...I need you in my office. Now.

I love this forum.

agreed!!
*grabs camera to take stalker-atzzi pictures for future blackmail*

Marbella · Post by **Marbella** » Mon Jul 02, 2007 10:40 pm

How do I become a doctor here?

I like the chocolate chip cookie analogy to LG-15

Could I be Dr. Marbella, Research Director on Chocolate Chippery?

kellylen · Post by **kellylen** » Mon Jul 02, 2007 10:51 pm

i am also the local chemist but kenny forgets to include that

deagol · Post by **deagol** » Mon Jul 02, 2007 11:30 pm

In my role of Director of Relativistic Lonelistic Physics Research, I thought it was appropriate that I defined a few concepts and explained in lay terms some of the principles behind our research:

General uncreativity is the theatrical theory of crapitation. It unifies special uncreativity, Python's law of universal crapitation, and the insight that crapitational acceleration can be described by the frivolity of chase and crime.

Some crapitational effects include:
Crapitational light pandering: crap may sometimes seem light, but it can accumulate to pretty heavy stuff.
Crapitational time dilation: crap distends time so that you'll always wait for the next video. Inevitably, all clocks will run slower while waiting.
Crapitational bedshift: the frequency of sleep will increase (shifting visible fans towards the bed end of the spectrum) as it moves to higher crapitational potentials (out of a crapity smell).
Crapitational radiation: krappa-rays made of krapitons are dangerous to most observers.
Crap holes: crap holes are plot holes which have crapitationally collapsed behind a non-event horizon. a crap hole is so massive that sight cannot escape its gravitational pull.

Although it was created as a theory of crapitation, it was soon realized that general uncreativity could be used to model the Breeniverse, and so gave birth to the field of physical cosmetology.

stevemedigod · Post by **stevemedigod** » Mon Jul 02, 2007 11:30 pm

Greetings. Hope I can help. I'm especially glad there's a chemist on the staff here!:)

ghost_of_kenny · Post by **ghost_of_kenny** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:03 am

deagol wrote:In my role of Director of Relativistic Lonelistic Physics Research, I thought it was appropriate that I defined a few concepts and explained in lay terms some of the principles behind our research:

General uncreativity is the theatrical theory of crapitation. It unifies special uncreativity, Python's law of universal crapitation, and the insight that crapitational acceleration can be described by the frivolity of chase and crime.

Some crapitational effects include:
Crapitational light pandering: crap may sometimes seem light, but it can accumulate to pretty heavy stuff.
Crapitational time dilation: crap distends time so that you'll always wait for the next video. Inevitably, all clocks will run slower while waiting.
Crapitational bedshift: the frequency of sleep will increase (shifting visible fans towards the bed end of the spectrum) as it moves to higher crapitational potentials (out of a crapity smell).
Crapitational radiation: krappa-rays made of krapitons are dangerous to most observers.
Crap holes: crap holes are plot holes which have crapitationally collapsed behind a non-event horizon. a crap hole is so massive that sight cannot escape its gravitational pull.

Although it was created as a theory of crapitation, it was soon realized that general uncreativity could be used to model the Breeniverse, and so gave birth to the field of physical cosmetology.

Thanks Dr. Deagol, I will be sure to publish your fantastic work!

Marbella · Post by **Marbella** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:38 am

A prime example of lonelistic physics is the Quaker oatmeal chocolate chip breakfast cookie.

This cookie has tastier oatmeal flavor than a standard chocolate chip cookie or a standard oatmeal cookie.

Chocolate chippery improves both types of cookies, and makes up for the boring nature of each on their own. However, an oatmeal cookie tastes better than a cookie made with batter but no chocolate chips.

It is the batter itself which is relevant to the plot. The very filler material must be tasty in order to avoid holes.

(OK, so it's my first "report")

robtomorrow · Post by **robtomorrow** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:44 am

I have modeled the Elendi-Waffle Postulate on a parallel processing supercomputer I have in my basement, and it is clear that the Elendi-Waffle Postulate is in fact correct.

As you can see as Craptivity increases to infinity and the Potential Plot Arcs (PPA)s multiply exponentially, the Plot being negative -(Plot), it will never reach the Event Horizon and collapse into a Singularity or Plot Hole.

This is truly a unique phenomena we are studying here.

Marbella · Post by **Marbella** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:48 am

Wow! It's beautiful, doctor!

tricky-ticky-tavi · Post by **tricky-ticky-tavi** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:24 am

Attn: Fellow EWLPRI Scientists
Subject: Preliminary Qualitative Analysis of Individual Videostic Occurances

The following study addresses the classification of two independent particles that not only occur in the loneliest physical world, but influence the charge and reception of the overall phenomena.

I have isolated these particles and classified them as videons. These videons fall into two distinct categories. Observe:

Substantive Videons: These videons are defined by their noted possession of substance, having practical importance, and belonging to the essential nature of the occurance. These particles have a positive charge on the videostic occurance and can directly influence the reception of said video by the natural world. These particles present themselves in the videostic world as advancing the series and building character depth.

Filler Videons: These videons are considered for their secondary importance, and their obvious addition to increase the series/videostic occurance current weight, length, and size (respectively). These particles have a negative charge, and are as well, directly influencing the reception of the series as a whole. These videons are widely described as not advancing the series, and actually decreasing character depth.

In conclusion, there are high number of both particles in the individual videostic occurances and the series as a whole. As to the overall charge of the video, it is dependent upon the ratio of substantive particles to filler videons. It is not exactly clear how natural forum pressure affects these particles, but that will have to studied in the coming weeks. Also, in my next study I hope to have a quantitative analysis of the actual number of videons per videostic occurance.

Thank You,
Dr. TTT

giddeanx · Post by **giddeanx** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:49 am

robtomorrow wrote:

This is truly a unique phenomena we are studying here.

Now that looks like cotton candy and the perfect representation of what we have. Fine fillaments of importance suspended by thin-air in order to make its mass look larger than it actually is.