Lonelygirl15

There are things to consider when we are studing LG15.

The most important is that it is not completed:

In most cases, when we evaluate the worth of a cookie the cookie is finished. The cook has no more ingredients to add. Everything that makes up that cookie is evident and tastable.

What we are sampling with LG15 is the batter. We have no idea what this cookie may end up being in the future. We don't know if they will be adding more chocolate chips, peanut butter, or even almond extract. We could end up with a buckeye ball, a snickerdoodle, or even a no-bake cookie.

Some of this lack of foresight stems from the fact the cooks are not following any exsisting recipe. Actually at times it seems as if the cooks are not using a recipe at all, throwing ingredients into the bowl at random. Such experimentation is welcome of course, because we will still end up with a cookie. Hopefully in the end it will be one worth something.

This double metaphor makes me hungry.

Now, what about fundamental particles? Are there crapyons, and anti-crapyons? And what if they collide?

Doctor Giddeanx has written a valid point.

But I would like to add that they do not seem hesitant in removing large parts of the cookie after they have been already placed in, showing that they are creating this carelessly at times. One time is when they took the ideas from another "Chef" and attempted to place it into their mix. However, there was much argument as to created this new flavor, and a lawsuit followed, in which a large part of the cookie mix was haphazardly scraped out. During this process, some parts of the better ingredients of the cookie were lost as well, creating a most unpleasant effect.

Therefore, the cookie can be called "elastic", being that it has the ability to change and conform to the surrounding situation, which is mostly influenced by all of the "taste testers", which are us. This adaptability, however, limits what I like to call the "Artistic Fabric", which is the thread of energy that runs through a creation such as this. The Artistic Fabric, or thread, is the lifeline of the creation, and if it is completely ignored, catastrophic effects may occur, which may ultimately cause a collapse, turning the entirety of the creation into nothing.

This can be compared to the death of a star. When the star runs out of energy (Or in this case, severs the Artistic Fabric), it dies, and begins to lose energy, and eventually becomes a black hole. This black hole in turn draws in everything around it and compresses it (us) to a point where it becomes insignificant (The creators do not listen to us and destroy what they have built).

deagol wrote:This double metaphor makes me hungry.

That is exactly why I included recipes.

This whole thread makes me hungry.

What if the case actually involves a Tape-Worm Hole that has been eating all the delicious chocolate plot-icle, leaving us with only the soft doughee 'Filler' video.

This would mean THAT THERE WAS a plot and that the ever growing c/sF filler is reaching infinate mass and volume, then will fall into it's own plot hole.

Well it is possible...

but yet, a black hole exists within a universe that contintues to expand.

Food for thought.

Now the universe was to return to a singularity we would all be in trouble. But that does not seem to be happening.

What I meant was there might have been a plot at some point, eons ago, but now the entire creation, not the plot, is turning into a black hole.

For this whole thread. Happy snarking, good stuff so far!

I agree. This is very fun.

stevemedigod wrote:Now, what about fundamental particles? Are there crapyons, and anti-crapyons? And what if they collide?

That is a very good question.

All forces have associated particles, so just as Gravity has it's associated particle the Gravitron, Craptivity also has an associated particle the Crapyon. Crapyons are always negatively charged, it has a Nonsense Mass of 100, and a Hype 1/2 Spin.

While it is true that all particles have a corresponding anti-particles, in the case of the Crapyon there does not seem to be an anti-particle or least in the phenomena under study none to be found, this is a mystery.

One hypothesis it that the anti-Crapyons being positively charged are all being absorbed by -(Plot).

Is there any chance of the anti- Crapyons losing an electron and thus becoming Crapyons?

Spades wrote:Is there any chance of the anti- Crapyons losing an electron and thus becoming Crapyons?

oh absolutely all the time

thats how something anti-crapyontastic becomes crapyontastic instantly

Hmmmm, interesting...

*Takes notes*

Marbella wrote:Wow! It's beautiful, doctor!