Ok, I don't want to start a philosophical discussion on Beauty here, but I want to claim my right to say that an actress is beautiful, or attractive, without being accused of being a porn-addict-sexual-perv. I happen to have in my hands, right here, a wonderful book by Umberto Eco on Beauty. As far as I know, no one ever accused Umberto Eco of being a perv. Yes, I said Gemma is attractive and I don't see why it's crude, nor why women on this board should feel like I'm attacking their gender. That doesn't mean I'm drooling on her picture nor ambition to get in her bed. I'm married with a woman I love and who's much more attractive than all these 19-year old girls, by the way. Beauty is not pornographic. It's a quality. Our society has always been a little obsessive about beauty, and yeah, women's beauty. Just go in a museum and look at some old paintings. Seeing a beautiful woman walking in the street in the morning when I go to work, makes the sun shine a little brighter but I'm not going to jump on her nor cheat on my wife. There is nothing sexual in saying someone is beautiful.I like beauty, in general, and in people, male or female, in particular. And I don't feel like I'm denigrating women when I say an actress is attractive. Of course, I don't really care how my friends look. But, pardon me, inner beauty takes a little more time to discover in people than the way they look from the outside.nobackspacebutton wrote: exactly. this is a game, not some porno.
And, btw, this is not a game, this a show. The beauty, cuteness, attractiveness, of the actress are a commercial move. There isn't a lot of ugly people in Hollywood, that I know of. Beauty can be just everywhere, in everything...and that makes the world a much pleasant place to live in.
Sorry for being out of topic, wordy, boring, but I had to say that, in response to the "this is not porn" comment.
