Lonelygirl15

and it wasn't edited by the killer because during both day segments the conversation matches the scenery ("10 miles left") so if the dialogue was ripped from the video they took it must have been a one day trip. if that were the case why would there be nighttime footage? it has to have been edited by Maddy and Adam or someone who can fake their voices perfectly. only two options that make sense

I totally agree with Solly... It's very true.

It looks like they had to've edited it.

Soo....they are alive?

We're hoping.

Am I just being really dense right now? That's entirely possible; it wouldn't be the first time. It's just that I still don't understand why the killer couldn't have edited it; couldn't the night footage have come from anywhere and simply been edited in amongst the actual Maddy/Adam video for some reason?

OOC: gah I can't believe I've only made eight post...I feel like I have been on here all day...

IC: what else is there to do but wait around for a hint...

OOG: either they are alive or its an honest mistake like the leg twitch just before Maddy gets wrapped up (I'd twitch too if a cat was licking my foot)

GawainsChallenge wrote:Am I just being really dense right now? That's entirely possible; it wouldn't be the first time. It's just that I still don't understand why the killer couldn't have edited it; couldn't the night footage have come from anywhere and simply been edited in amongst the actual Maddy/Adam video for some reason?

it could have but not only does it seem to match up but "for some reason" doesn't really work. seems like a lot of trouble to go to on a whim

wow I didn't notice a leg twitch at all...

OOG: watch just before the red changes back to color

OOC: okay so I didn't see a cat all I saw was the bag grazing her leg, but I did see it move but maybe he jostled her while he was packing her up?

I just realized something! The audio DOES NOT match up during the first day sequence! They're reading signs in the audio, but there are no signs to be seen. Maddison says "next exit", but they aren't on a limited access road; it's a backroad. The entire thing is edited over. I'm not yet sure what this implies, other than that they seem to be on I-10 during the audio, the only road with exits that runs past Kerrville.

GawainsChallenge wrote:I just realized something! The audio DOES NOT match up during the first day sequence! They're reading signs in the audio, but there are no signs to be seen. Maddison says "next exit", but they aren't on a limited access road; it's a backroad. The entire thing is edited over. I'm not yet sure what this implies.

and the plot thickens...

Actually, we have no proof that the visuals from the driving sequence even came from their camera. We never see them, only hear them.

GawainsChallenge wrote:Actually, we have no proof that the visuals from the driving sequence even came from their camera. We never see them, only hear them.

except when they get out of the car and Maddison places the camera on top of it (I assume it's on top of the car...right height, Adam goes to the right where a trunk would be and appears with a bag)
but that part keeps bothering me. If this isn't a set-up, why aim the camera like that? If you're intending on going inside, why would you carefully set up the camera on the roof of your car?
it's like they were expecting something to happen.
hence, it *was* staged! at least I'd like to think so.

ETA and why would Maddison run back around the car to get shot? I mean, if someone was shooting at me I would run far far away as fast as possible, not back around in a circle like a Benny Hill clip