Hahahaa! I'll be right behind you! Though I don't think it will go that far. He just seems very similar to Bree in his playful, easygoing manner and in his background. Or maybe he'll start talking to his boxing gloves....sphinx wrote:Complete? If I see Jonas talking to a handpuppet ONCE in any of his videos, I will run away from the whole LG15 series screaming, and I won't look back.silvermoon wrote:
Again, everyone has a differing opinion on that. I think he was sort of adorable and playful.
Daniel is deep and brooding. I can't see him doing head stands and rolling in the grass.
Jonas is a nice change. Someone willing to have some fun.
I think he is the complete male version of Bree. A little too young for their age, a little sheltered, a little tragic, but still silly.
Are you ready for where the plot is headed...
Moderator: Moderators
- Way2Curious
- Enthusiastic Fan
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 3:14 am
That would be kind of creepy...... on that note I also hope he doesn't talk to his "mother" (while wearing a wig).....Jonas Bates?silvermoon wrote: Or maybe he'll start talking to his boxing gloves....
Please don't let him be a hotel heir.....
I discovered Jonas....LOL Well sort of... http://www.lonelygirl15.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3059
That would actually be pretty convenient! They could run from hotel to hotel across the country! Maybe he's related to the Hilton sisters.Way2Curious wrote:That would be kind of creepy...... on that note I also hope he doesn't talk to his "mother" (while wearing a wig).....Jonas Bates?silvermoon wrote: Or maybe he'll start talking to his boxing gloves....
Please don't let him be a hotel heir.....
- Way2Curious
- Enthusiastic Fan
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 3:14 am
If he's related to them, it won't be long before we get a "video"silvermoon wrote:That would actually be pretty convenient! They could run from hotel to hotel across the country! Maybe he's related to the Hilton sisters.Way2Curious wrote:That would be kind of creepy...... on that note I also hope he doesn't talk to his "mother" (while wearing a wig).....Jonas Bates?silvermoon wrote: Or maybe he'll start talking to his boxing gloves....
Please don't let him be a hotel heir.....
I discovered Jonas....LOL Well sort of... http://www.lonelygirl15.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3059
Hahahahaaa! I might actually watch that one!Way2Curious wrote:If he's related to them, it won't be long before we get a "video"silvermoon wrote:That would actually be pretty convenient! They could run from hotel to hotel across the country! Maybe he's related to the Hilton sisters.Way2Curious wrote:That would be kind of creepy...... on that note I also hope he doesn't talk to his "mother" (while wearing a wig).....Jonas Bates?silvermoon wrote: Or maybe he'll start talking to his boxing gloves....
Please don't let him be a hotel heir.....
Horrendously (sp?) bad.MrsCop wrote:Hi Lesbrent! So, what are your thoughts on Gemma's vids?
It's only like 4 females so far on here that think Jonas is a welcome addition. You've just all managed to post a million times about it.
Yeah, I'm a girl too. Jonas is a good looking male but adding this to LG? No, it doesn't work for me.
I'd avoid the party thread, then.lesbrent wrote:Horrendously (sp?) bad.MrsCop wrote:Hi Lesbrent! So, what are your thoughts on Gemma's vids?
It's only like 4 females so far on here that think Jonas is a welcome addition. You've just all managed to post a million times about it.
Yeah, I'm a girl too. Jonas is a good looking male but adding this to LG? No, it doesn't work for me.
silvermoon wrote:I'd avoid the party thread, then.lesbrent wrote:Horrendously (sp?) bad.MrsCop wrote:Hi Lesbrent! So, what are your thoughts on Gemma's vids?
It's only like 4 females so far on here that think Jonas is a welcome addition. You've just all managed to post a million times about it.
Yeah, I'm a girl too. Jonas is a good looking male but adding this to LG? No, it doesn't work for me.
The guy's as hansome as the elephant man. People are really getting on my nerves with this "cute' buisness.watchingall wrote:Well if he IS cannon, Im certainly going to enjoy watching him over Daniel. Sorry Daniel and Daniel fans... Jonas is a lot cuter and much more fun to watch!
How does he fit in? SHOULD he fit in? *shrug* For pure eye candy, this is ok with me! :p
On topic: Jonas hasn't been proven cannon, you're just an ass for saying "No ifs, ands, or buts about it". Get some proof, then I'll listen.
Oh, and 'because his videos have great production quality' isn't proof. He's rich, he can go out and buy a good webcam.
I'm a guy. Is that so hard for you people to get?
Paul x YER MOM = My OTP!
Paul x YER MOM = My OTP!
Falls wrote:The guy's as hansome as the elephant man. People are really getting on my nerves with this "cute' buisness.watchingall wrote:Well if he IS cannon, Im certainly going to enjoy watching him over Daniel. Sorry Daniel and Daniel fans... Jonas is a lot cuter and much more fun to watch!
How does he fit in? SHOULD he fit in? *shrug* For pure eye candy, this is ok with me! :p
On topic: Jonas hasn't been proven cannon, you're just an ass for saying "No ifs, ands, or buts about it". Get some proof, then I'll listen.
Oh, and 'because his videos have great production quality' isn't proof. He's rich, he can go out and buy a good webcam.
Ummmm, Bree just acknowledged him in the new video. There's the proof.
I take it you're a guy?
That isn't proof. And while my gender will remain a secret, I will tell you that I am attracted to guys. Not this guy, though. I'm not really into homosexuals.silvermoon wrote:Falls wrote:The guy's as hansome as the elephant man. People are really getting on my nerves with this "cute' buisness.watchingall wrote:Well if he IS cannon, Im certainly going to enjoy watching him over Daniel. Sorry Daniel and Daniel fans... Jonas is a lot cuter and much more fun to watch!
How does he fit in? SHOULD he fit in? *shrug* For pure eye candy, this is ok with me! :p
On topic: Jonas hasn't been proven cannon, you're just an ass for saying "No ifs, ands, or buts about it". Get some proof, then I'll listen.
Oh, and 'because his videos have great production quality' isn't proof. He's rich, he can go out and buy a good webcam.
Ummmm, Bree just acknowledged him in the new video. There's the proof.
I take it you're a guy?
I'm a guy. Is that so hard for you people to get?
Paul x YER MOM = My OTP!
Paul x YER MOM = My OTP!
- watchingall
- Lonely Fan
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:31 pm
Excuse me but I never said No ifs ands or butts about it. Thanks for stepping up that maturity level and calling me names! Bravo!Falls wrote:The guy's as hansome as the elephant man. People are really getting on my nerves with this "cute' buisness.watchingall wrote:Well if he IS cannon, Im certainly going to enjoy watching him over Daniel. Sorry Daniel and Daniel fans... Jonas is a lot cuter and much more fun to watch!
How does he fit in? SHOULD he fit in? *shrug* For pure eye candy, this is ok with me! :p
On topic: Jonas hasn't been proven cannon, you're just an ass for saying "No ifs, ands, or buts about it". Get some proof, then I'll listen.
Oh, and 'because his videos have great production quality' isn't proof. He's rich, he can go out and buy a good webcam.
All I said is the fact that he was mentioned points really heavily towards him being cannon. I never said anything at all about his production value etc
If youre going to take it so seriously, you know, your nerves being shot and all, maybe you need to take a step away from the ol computer. You sound a little tense. Take a few deep breaths and practice some relaxation techniques. Then repeat after me, "This is just an internet game, I will not call people names over their opinions"
And BTW, i will be looking for an apology if he is proven cannon. You seem to have a problem with anyone who thinks he is cute. Should I turn around and call everyone who thinks Daniel is cute is an ... what was it? oh yeah... an "ass"?
looking back I realize that all this may not have been pointed at me. But if it wasnt why did you quote me?
Because I was using an example. It wasn't pointed at you. The only part pointed at you was that making a bold statement, such as you know he's cannon and there can be no rebuttle to your opinion(when you say no ifs, ands, or buts about it, that's saying no one can argue this). Yes, I was calling you an ass. I call them as I see them. Saying no-one can rebut you is being an ass. That's not name calling, that's just the truth, dear. (I wasn't calling you that for thinking Jonas is cute, I didn't know you thought that). And the only way I'd apologize, is if you didn't mean to say that no one is allowed to have a different opinion than yours, and I'm just taking it wrong. Otherwise, my statement stands.watchingall wrote:Excuse me but I never said No ifs ands or butts about it. Thanks for stepping up that maturity level and calling me names! Bravo!Falls wrote:The guy's as hansome as the elephant man. People are really getting on my nerves with this "cute' buisness.watchingall wrote:Well if he IS cannon, Im certainly going to enjoy watching him over Daniel. Sorry Daniel and Daniel fans... Jonas is a lot cuter and much more fun to watch!
How does he fit in? SHOULD he fit in? *shrug* For pure eye candy, this is ok with me! :p
On topic: Jonas hasn't been proven cannon, you're just an ass for saying "No ifs, ands, or buts about it". Get some proof, then I'll listen.
Oh, and 'because his videos have great production quality' isn't proof. He's rich, he can go out and buy a good webcam.
All I said is the fact that he was mentioned points really heavily towards him being cannon. I never said anything at all about his production value etc
If youre going to take it so seriously, you know, your nerves being shot and all, maybe you need to take a step away from the ol computer. You sound a little tense. Take a few deep breaths and practice some relaxation techniques. Then repeat after me, "This is just an internet game, I will not call people names over their opinions"
And BTW, i will be looking for an apology if he is proven cannon. You seem to have a problem with anyone who thinks he is cute. Should I turn around and call everyone who thinks Daniel is cute is an ... what was it? oh yeah... an "ass"?
looking back I realize that all this may not have been pointed at me. But if it wasnt why did you quote me?
As for the prodcution values thing: At least three other people on the forum have said he's cannon because of production values and editing. I was just putting that out there because it's an annoying arguement that can be a complete coincidence.
Oh,and I've been away from the computer all day, I'm just on now because I consider it a fun activity. Stepping off when I get right back on because someone thinks I'm taking a game too seriously would be a first for me.
I'm a guy. Is that so hard for you people to get?
Paul x YER MOM = My OTP!
Paul x YER MOM = My OTP!
- watchingall
- Lonely Fan
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:31 pm
Please show me where I said I KNOW he is cannon and I'll apologize. I can point you to several posters who KNOW Jonas is cannon. Im not one of them. In fact this is exactly what I said.Falls wrote:Because I was using an example. It wasn't pointed at you. The only part pointed at you was that making a bold statement, such as you know he's cannon and there can be no rebuttle to your opinion(when you say no ifs, ands, or buts about it, that's saying no one can argue this). Yes, I was calling you an ass. I call them as I see them. Saying no-one can rebut you is being an ass. That's not name calling, that's just the truth, dear. (I wasn't calling you that for thinking Jonas is cute, I didn't know you thought that). And the only way I'd apologize, is if you didn't mean to say that no one is allowed to have a different opinion than yours, and I'm just taking it wrong. Otherwise, my statement stands.watchingall wrote:Excuse me but I never said No ifs ands or butts about it. Thanks for stepping up that maturity level and calling me names! Bravo!Falls wrote:The guy's as hansome as the elephant man. People are really getting on my nerves with this "cute' buisness.watchingall wrote:Well if he IS cannon, Im certainly going to enjoy watching him over Daniel. Sorry Daniel and Daniel fans... Jonas is a lot cuter and much more fun to watch!
How does he fit in? SHOULD he fit in? *shrug* For pure eye candy, this is ok with me! :p
On topic: Jonas hasn't been proven cannon, you're just an ass for saying "No ifs, ands, or buts about it". Get some proof, then I'll listen.
Oh, and 'because his videos have great production quality' isn't proof. He's rich, he can go out and buy a good webcam.
All I said is the fact that he was mentioned points really heavily towards him being cannon. I never said anything at all about his production value etc
If youre going to take it so seriously, you know, your nerves being shot and all, maybe you need to take a step away from the ol computer. You sound a little tense. Take a few deep breaths and practice some relaxation techniques. Then repeat after me, "This is just an internet game, I will not call people names over their opinions"
And BTW, i will be looking for an apology if he is proven cannon. You seem to have a problem with anyone who thinks he is cute. Should I turn around and call everyone who thinks Daniel is cute is an ... what was it? oh yeah... an "ass"?
looking back I realize that all this may not have been pointed at me. But if it wasnt why did you quote me?
As for the prodcution values thing: At least three other people on the forum have said he's cannon because of production values and editing. I was just putting that out there because it's an annoying arguement that can be a complete coincidence.
Oh,and I've been away from the computer all day, I'm just on now because I consider it a fun activity. Stepping off when I get right back on because someone thinks I'm taking a game too seriously would be a first for me.
"watchingall wrote:
Well if he IS cannon, Im certainly going to enjoy watching him over Daniel. Sorry Daniel and Daniel fans... Jonas is a lot cuter and much more fun to watch!
How does he fit in? SHOULD he fit in? *shrug* For pure eye candy, this is ok with me! :p"
Basically my two sentence statement was I had no idea if he fit in or not but I didnt mind watching him cause he's kinda cute.
Which makes me wonder if you read my post at all. In your reply you said I knew he was cannon, there could be no rebuttle and you didnt notice me saying he was cute.
Any chance you quoted the wrong person?