Lonelygirl15

Luminous wrote: Thanks!

anytime

Samara wrote:Well, you horn dogs finally got Jonas sans shirt...and you still don't see much. BWAH HAHAHAHAHAHAH.

... its not that much of an evil thing...

*shrugs*

and they say her name in the description and taylor has mentioned her before

alysaface wrote:

Aja wrote:So they introduce a new character and tell us nothing about her... grrr. Did they even tell us her name in the video, or was it only in the vid description?

When Bree was in the bathroom she mentioned something about Taylor and her sister.. I guess that was the introduction?

Just re-watched and they never mention her name - not once.

ETA: I guess I just expected that if they're going to introduce a new character, we would have been given a *little* bit more info for all of us who haven't been tracking down girls on youtube and myspace.

So is it Sara or Sarah. Because it says Sara in the description.

But anyway, the video was kinda fun but I hate the title.
I just don't like the word 'emo'.

Aja wrote:

alysaface wrote:

Aja wrote:So they introduce a new character and tell us nothing about her... grrr. Did they even tell us her name in the video, or was it only in the vid description?

When Bree was in the bathroom she mentioned something about Taylor and her sister.. I guess that was the introduction?

Just re-watched and they never mention her name - not once.

I never said her name was mentioned, I said Bree said Taylor and her sister..

yoruba wrote:So is it Sara or Sarah. Because it says Sara in the description.

But anyway, the video was kinda fun but I hate the title.
I just don't like the word 'emo'.

does it matter much?

and like i said before. taylor has mentioned her sister and we see her name on her door i believe

yoruba wrote: But anyway, the video was kinda fun but I hate the title.
I just don't like the word 'emo'.

The word "emo" makes you want to cry?

impulse wrote:

yoruba wrote: But anyway, the video was kinda fun but I hate the title.
I just don't like the word 'emo'.

The word "emo" makes you want to cry?

It makes me cry....*wipes away tears*..great..now my eyeliner is ruined!!!!! *le sigh*

Uh oh... Daniel's going to fall in love again.
I do have to say that my heart fluttered a bit when Daniel said, "She's got a gun."


ETA: Waaaaaay back in the beginning, when Bree was driving Thor around in a dump truck, I commented on the fact that it was odd for a family with one teen daughter, who'd recently did an international move, to have baby toys (CURRENT baby toys, from Target) in the house. Now...we have all of these "Order girls" with sisters (little and big). Kind of makes me wonder if there will be some Bree bombshell about "having a sister once"? Ok... I'll stop stretching now.

kellylen wrote:

yoruba wrote:So is it Sara or Sarah. Because it says Sara in the description.

But anyway, the video was kinda fun but I hate the title.
I just don't like the word 'emo'.

does it matter much?

No it doesn't matter much. What matters is that after 12 videos of nonsense, we get a 1.29' vid, that we could expect would finally go somewhere plot wise, but we get random girl pulling out a stupid stunt and Daniel complaining about his boxers.


O Jeromy, please, bring Maddison back to life! I'm trying, I swear I'm trying to like LG15 again, but the Creators do everything they can to ruin it for me.

haha i loved the boxer thing.

ive watched that scene like 4 times already cause it was cute

I liked this video. Right touch - and right style - of humor, Jonas' fangirls got a little something, and we got the crazy emo girl (who was instantly awesome in my book).

My interest is renewed. We'll see if my faith is as well.

Aja wrote:

alysaface wrote:

Aja wrote:So they introduce a new character and tell us nothing about her... grrr. Did they even tell us her name in the video, or was it only in the vid description?

When Bree was in the bathroom she mentioned something about Taylor and her sister.. I guess that was the introduction?

Just re-watched and they never mention her name - not once.

ETA: I guess I just expected that if they're going to introduce a new character, we would have been given a *little* bit more info for all of us who haven't been tracking down girls on youtube and myspace.

Why does it matter that it wasn't said in the video? One doesn't have to go to YouTube or myspace to read the vid description.

yoruba wrote:So is it Sara or Sarah. Because it says Sara in the description.

It's "Sarah." Bree has a habit of getting names wrong.

yoruba wrote:But anyway, the video was kinda fun but I hate the title.
I just don't like the word 'emo'.

This girl is totally emo. Whether one likes the word or not, it applies to her.

impulse wrote:No it doesn't matter much. What matters is that after 12 videos of nonsense, we get a 1.29' vid, that we could expect would finally go somewhere plot wise, but we get random girl pulling out a stupid stunt and Daniel complaining about his boxers.

As one of the biggest complainers of recent problems with the plot (okay, recent and longtime problems with the plot), I thought I should reiterate that I liked this.

the forum says sara

so i guess its sara?

but ok wait

the myspace says sarah

oivey my head is confused

Lurker wrote:

impulse wrote:No it doesn't matter much. What matters is that after 12 videos of nonsense, we get a 1.29' vid, that we could expect would finally go somewhere plot wise, but we get random girl pulling out a stupid stunt and Daniel complaining about his boxers.

As one of the biggest complainers of recent problems with the plot (okay, recent and longtime problems with the plot), I thought I should reiterate that I liked this.

Your faith is stronger than mine, but I can see why your interest is renewed with this video. From my point of view, it reveals two things. They heard the complains and are willing to shift the gear. However, they don't have much in store to provide us with a decent story line.

Do we know whether Sara(h) is supposed to be a younger or older sister?

She looks older than Taylor, but something tells me that isn't correct.