Page 4 of 5
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:16 am
by brandoblues
i thought it was cool the admin posted tonight somewhere around this forum. they dig ciw, you can tell.
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:58 am
by curriguy
Kelrast anagrams to "Stalker"
I don't know what my point is. but hey! just one more thing that him and cassie have in common.
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:03 am
by Kelrast
Kelrast has blown a couple of calls, though. The first poem was NOT a Shakespearean sonnet, and the number of words per line in the anagram did NOT equate to the number of words per line in the poem. Kelrast may be human after all.
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:05 am
by Luv2Luvem
Ok Frank
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:12 am
by toadlguy
Kelrast wrote:Kelrast has blown a couple of calls, though. The first poem was NOT a Shakespearean sonnet, and the number of words per line in the anagram did NOT equate to the number of words per line in the poem. Kelrast may be human after all.
How interesting you should point that out. Of course - now, if you point out any flaws in Kelrast's (your, Franks) performance, it will just confirm that your are he (or they) or whatever.
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:23 am
by toadlguy
Francis Kelrast
=
can ask, lift errs
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:26 am
by Luv2Luvem
Do you think he was here checking that we had gotten the last poem right?
So that he could tell Cassie we're ready for the next clue?
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:29 am
by toadlguy
Luv2Luvem wrote:Do you think he was here checking that we had gotten the last poem right?
So that he could tell Cassie we're ready for the next clue?
Nah - he was just defending his honor (shills are not supposed to be discovered)
Or he was just pointing out some useful information as all good CiW posters do
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:30 am
by Luv2Luvem
I hope we haven't offended him.
I do appreciate his help.
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:32 am
by toadlguy
This is now the official home of "The Kelrast Conspiracy". Maybe if we act real nutty people will forget that were right (like most conspiracies - bwu hahaha).
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:34 am
by toadlguy
Luv2Luvem wrote:I hope we haven't offended him.
I do appreciate his help.
Maybe we should tip toe away quietly
- .. .--. / - --- .
- .. .--. / - --- .
- .. .--. / - --- .
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:35 am
by kristy2520
Maybe Kelrast just happens to be pretty good at figuring out anagrams...whatever the case I'm sure he/she's enjoying all of this attention.
Also, I think someone can appear to be logging right in and out because there is an option to hide your online status. Meaning he could post but immediately afterwards it will appear as if he is logged off, whether he really is or not.
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:35 am
by Luv2Luvem
toadlguy wrote:Luv2Luvem wrote:I hope we haven't offended him.
I do appreciate his help.
Maybe we should tip toe away quietly
- .. .--. / - --- .
- .. .--. / - --- .
- .. .--. / - --- .
I agree...no more poking fun from me.
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:36 am
by toadlguy
kristy2520 wrote:Maybe Kelrast just happens to be pretty good at figuring out anagrams...whatever the case I'm sure he/she's enjoying all of this attention.
Also, I think someone can appear to be logging right in and out because there is an option to hide your online status. Meaning he could post but immediately afterwards it will appear as if he is logged off, whether he really is or not.
Sounds suspicious --- bwu ha ha ha
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:37 am
by Luv2Luvem
Could Kristy be Kelrast's "new" name?
hehehe Hows that for nutty?