Page 4 of 4
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 2:31 pm
by Ziola
ihavenopantson wrote:what a silly idea, what would he bring to the vid for the masses?
all the geeks just want this because they would see it as justification for themselves if their leader (TW) was put in an official vid
so thats a 'NO' for me
Are you having a rough couple of days? Because all of your posts I've seen lately have been not very nice. I think you should have a cup of tea, some biscuits, do some yoga and relax. Then come back and play when you are in a better mood.
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 6:31 pm
by betz28
double yes!
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:07 am
by Languorous Lass
I think this is a great idea. There's no need to feature TWJ in a major role. Just put him in the background, either Live! In Person! or in a pic -- like when Bree took P. Monkey to the movies, TW could have been in a "movie poster." Easy to do, and a great tribute to a great guy.
And the objections raised by Mr. or Ms. "ihavenopantson" don't hold water. Those viewers who don't know TW won't recognize him. And if the inclusion is done subtly, the vid won't call attention to his inclusion. Sort of like Alfred Hitchcock used to appear somewhere in every single one of his movies -- sometimes his appearance was so subtle that you had to search for it. Similarly, Stan Lee appeared in one of the Spider-Man movies, but even if you knew what he looked like you had to be alert to notice his appearance.
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:10 pm
by AutoPilate
He and Lou Ferrigno cameoed in Hulk. Not TW, Stan Lee.
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:21 pm
by Languorous Lass
Not TW?
Damn. I'm disappointed.
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:37 pm
by Kasdeja
The Lord of the Rings dude was in a scene...