[Update] CanYouHearHer Blog (10/02/06)

toadlguy · Post by **toadlguy** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:39 am

Luv2Luvem wrote:This has got to be a clue we were supposed to have found when we first found Frank's blog. I'm thinking it was meant to be more of a confirmation that we have found what she wanted us to find. I very much doubt that the whole blog would be an anagram since there are only, what, 7 days until the 12th?

At least I hope I'm right.

If in fact the whole thing is an anagram - then Cassies intentions are clear - she is trying to make all our heads explode (as it is have you noticed that in random forums - someone screams and kaboom - their head explodes - be careful)

Sungkoo · Post by **Sungkoo** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:41 am

lol, we're droppin like flys

Luv2Luvem · Post by **Luv2Luvem** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:42 am

I have noticed a lot of people wandering around without heads, now you mention it.

vertigo · Post by **vertigo** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:43 am

I don't want to believe that the blog is an anagram........ too...... many.... words..........

sc · Post by sc » Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:44 am

it's not... her anagrams make no sense until they've been solved, not before, and this whole thing makes sense... dear god, this stuff makes sense... that makes me so sick in the head!

toadlguy · Post by **toadlguy** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:46 am

Be careful . . . . down this road, madness lies.

vertigo · Post by **vertigo** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:47 am

We're all already insane.

I don't watch tv or read or do anything else for fun in my spare time.... it's all to Cassie.... even went I go to sleep, it's thinking about this whole thing!

There's no way back, we're so gone.

Luv2Luvem · Post by **Luv2Luvem** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:50 am

what are the chances that you would be able to turn one paragraph into an anagram that makes perfect sense? Not to mention mutiple paragraphs that make sense w/ each other. Nil. All of our other anagram clues have been nonsense words in a line.
Now if anyone still wants to believe that there are anagrams in Frank's blog then I would suggest things like the other letters that start the paragraphs (meaning in the new posts), the words in quotation marks (why he put "standing by" in quotes always bothered me), or the words the are bold.
Me, I am going to take this to be another clue that we were supposed to get before but just overlooked, because frankly (excuse the pun) I am sick to death of anagrams and can't take much more.
Whew, ok rant over.

CDegeyter · Post by **CDegeyter** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:00 am

I cant research right now, but could it be that the first letters on each of his entries are seperate anagrams? I agree that each entry cant be an anagram but if we follow the example of the first entry it may work. (Darn I wish I was home to try this out)

edit: nevermind. A quick look at the entries killed that theory

laurenesque · Post by **laurenesque** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:03 am

CDegeyter wrote:I cant research right now, but could it be that the first letters on each of his entries are seperate anagrams? I agree that each entry cant be an anagram but if we follow the example of the first entry it may work. (Darn I wish I was home to try this out)

Someone has already confirmed that the first entry's first letters code out to "CODES INTO SERAPIS"... dunno about the others though. They seem to be random...

(in no particular letter order)
2nd entry: SI
3rd entry: HBBIII
4th entry: IWMO

Noava22 · Post by **Noava22** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:28 am

Luv2Luvem wrote:what are the chances that you would be able to turn one paragraph into an anagram that makes perfect sense? Not to mention mutiple paragraphs that make sense w/ each other. Nil. All of our other anagram clues have been nonsense words in a line.
Now if anyone still wants to believe that there are anagrams in Frank's blog then I would suggest things like the other letters that start the paragraphs (meaning in the new posts), the words in quotation marks (why he put "standing by" in quotes always bothered me), or the words the are bold.
Me, I am going to take this to be another clue that we were supposed to get before but just overlooked, because frankly (excuse the pun) I am sick to death of anagrams and can't take much more.
Whew, ok rant over.

See...Frank types in a very articulate manner, in such that there are few (if any) grammatical errors. In his third blog, a whole day, he misspells very when describing his gun (it says vey, very).

I can't help but think that's not a typo.

Luv2Luvem · Post by **Luv2Luvem** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:45 am

Noava22 wrote:
See...Frank types in a very articulate manner, in such that there are few (if any) grammatical errors. In his third blog, a whole day, he misspells very when describing his gun (it says vey, very).

I can't help but think that's not a typo.

Well, then add typos or whatever to the things I listed. But I still don't believe thw whole thing is a anagram...no way.

incursive · Post by **incursive** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 12:30 pm

if we go through and collect all the typos and it ends up being a message... then cassie must have been reading lemony snicket's a series of unfortunate events haha.

jrea54 · Post by **jrea54** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:38 pm

incursive wrote:if we go through and collect all the typos and it ends up being a message... then cassie must have been reading lemony snicket's a series of unfortunate events haha.

hahahahaha i love that movie.
seriously though if it is, or its an anagram, i'll die. i dont even solve any of them, i'll just die.

Kalamitye · Post by **Kalamitye** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:19 pm

Maybe it's just all the capitalized letters? Probably not, but just a thought.