Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:20 pm
I said that too...or the words in quotation marks.Kalamitye wrote:Maybe it's just all the capitalized letters? Probably not, but just a thought.
Forum to post messages about Bree and Danielbeast
http://pdp11.nitemarecafe.com/forum/
I said that too...or the words in quotation marks.Kalamitye wrote:Maybe it's just all the capitalized letters? Probably not, but just a thought.
A sample (pattern) of 3 is not very conclusive.katiegirl15 wrote:Alrighty, so I'm not sure if anybody has notice this yet (sorry, not gonna read through 30-some pages to find out, either), but Frank writes in his blog every other day (so far). He's got 4 so far, and the archives are as follows.
9/29
10/1 (2 entries, same day)
10/3
Perhaps he'll write tomorrow? If we continue to follow this pattern, it means he won't be writing on the 12th, but will the 11th and 13th (Friday the 13th, just to throw it in).
Any thoughts?
So how does Bree know about Cassie - she brought her up.lucky wrote:I know this probably means nothing but I was thinking:
What if Cassie was never real (Ex: Imaginary friend, or she died a long time ago). Maybe if Cassie died a long time ago, it's possible she was faced with the same fate that Bree is about to face. And Cassie is working through Frank (like others have mentioned) to warn Bree. That might also explain why Daniel doesn't know who Bree is talking about when she mentions Cassie.
Okay, it's a strech maybe, but a possibility.
Agreed, but it was just something I noticed. He hasn't written today either.toadlguy wrote:A sample (pattern) of 3 is not very conclusive.katiegirl15 wrote:Alrighty, so I'm not sure if anybody has notice this yet (sorry, not gonna read through 30-some pages to find out, either), but Frank writes in his blog every other day (so far). He's got 4 so far, and the archives are as follows.
9/29
10/1 (2 entries, same day)
10/3
Perhaps he'll write tomorrow? If we continue to follow this pattern, it means he won't be writing on the 12th, but will the 11th and 13th (Friday the 13th, just to throw it in).
Any thoughts?
It has been suggested that this is just a sign that Frank is indeed OUR CASSIE's conduit and we aren't making some nutty guy nuttiertoadlguy wrote:Well, since Codes into Serapis is an anagram for "Cassie does not RIP". It could mean that even while Frank is on his blog (and not hearing voices) he is still channeling Cassie - and we need to watch precisely the words he uses (and maybe look for anagrams).Sungkoo wrote:I'm not sure how many of you have seen this. It was in the 'stay in character' thread, which has now been moved to the Meta forum.
The first letter of each paragraph in Franks first Blog spells out Codes Into Serapis
morrighana wrote:CODES INTO SERAPIS - has anything been posted about this? I'm sorry, but I haven't had much time to catch up today.
These are the first letters of each of the paragraphs in Franks first post.
Anyways, I did a search on the word SERAPIS in these forums and came up with a lot of matches, but well...let's just say I'm not searching through 50 pages of posts in one topic alone to find the word SERAPIS.
At any rate, does CODES INTO SERAPIS mean anything? Likely no, but I'm tryin' yo?
Thanks all!
Morri
GO
Maybe he can't write today because "Frank is Working" What cassie had on Youtube earlier...or maybe he'll have something to write because he is working...OR he's working on something to write about..katiegirl15 wrote:Alrighty, so I'm not sure if anybody has notice this yet (sorry, not gonna read through 30-some pages to find out, either), but Frank writes in his blog every other day (so far). He's got 4 so far, and the archives are as follows.
9/29
10/1 (2 entries, same day)
10/3
Perhaps he'll write tomorrow? If we continue to follow this pattern, it means he won't be writing on the 12th, but will the 11th and 13th (Friday the 13th, just to throw it in).
Any thoughts?
What the heck? I posted one comment on his blog and now this pops up on there today? Some people can be real idiots. I just want everyone to know this isn't me, I would never do something like this.TEHSPECTRE said...
I hear voices too. They tell me I'm in love with lard gaystroke. I've come to terms with it. You should too. Lardy gaystroker is da man.
Cassie thinks so.
- Spectre
The i's really do make it look as if it were meant to be broken up into 4 segments.A Voice Within
In this web log I advocate for a new approach to the phenomenon of hearing voices, while at the same time I try to figure out my own visitor. You are free to leave comments, but I ask that you be respectful.
this part just seems too stretched..its almost impossible to make a coherent sentence from a coherent sentence with anagrams..but..everything bears checking I guess.TehSpectre wrote:What the heck? I posted one comment on his blog and now this pops up on there today? Some people can be real idiots. I just want everyone to know this isn't me, I would never do something like this.TEHSPECTRE said...
I hear voices too. They tell me I'm in love with lard gaystroke. I've come to terms with it. You should too. Lardy gaystroker is da man.
Cassie thinks so.
- Spectre
=/
Edit: Just to make sure I add something to this discussion as well:
The i's really do make it look as if it were meant to be broken up into 4 segments.A Voice Within
In this web log I advocate for a new approach to the phenomenon of hearing voices, while at the same time I try to figure out my own visitor. You are free to leave comments, but I ask that you be respectful.
Good eye there.
Actually that is what an anagram IS. Anagrams are coherent sentences, phrases or words made from other coherent sentences, phrases or words. Most of what we have been deciphering are NOT anagrams, or at least not good anagrams. That being said - good anagrams are pretty difficult.lordgreystoke422 wrote:this part just seems too stretched..its almost impossible to make a coherent sentence from a coherent sentence with anagrams..but..everything bears checking I guess.
I've been working on anagraming these on and off for a while now, I haven't come up with anything else really, but it just seems to me if anything currently on his blog is going to be anagramed, this is it.lordgreystoke422 wrote: this part just seems too stretched..its almost impossible to make a coherent sentence from a coherent sentence with anagrams..but..everything bears checking I guess.