Forum to post messages about Bree and Danielbeast
http://pdp11.nitemarecafe.com/forum/
Here, here, Cosmic.cosmicdancer wrote:I think we have more important and relevant things to theorize about now than whether or not Bree's father is dead. There is more proof that he is dead than that he isn't. Therefore I think we should just leave it at that until the Creators decide to give us reason to believe otherwise.
Im with both of you. I think this thread is officialy closing soon...longlostposter wrote:Here, here, Cosmic.cosmicdancer wrote:I think we have more important and relevant things to theorize about now than whether or not Bree's father is dead. There is more proof that he is dead than that he isn't. Therefore I think we should just leave it at that until the Creators decide to give us reason to believe otherwise.
i am hereby convinced you have never read nor understood anything i've said. i give up.longlostposter wrote:My dad said my cat was dead, but I don't believe him because I didn't see the body.
I guess you missed the humor in that.platypusrex256 wrote:i am hereby convinced you have never read nor understood anything i've said. i give up.longlostposter wrote:My dad said my cat was dead, but I don't believe him because I didn't see the body.
She was referring to the eye symbolism when Gemma revealed the Watcher. This is from the original Illuminati thread HERE."The ancients believed this symbol of indestructibility would assist in rebirth." Which goes right along with my theory that the ceremony involves a man (either Daniel or Bree's father) being sacrificed and immediately reborn.
crap thats a lot of info. it took me a while to see what you were getting at but thats for the tip.trainer101 wrote:Waaaaayyy back in November, Langorous Lass wrote:She was referring to the eye symbolism when Gemma revealed the Watcher. This is from the original Illuminati thread HERE."The ancients believed this symbol of indestructibility would assist in rebirth." Which goes right along with my theory that the ceremony involves a man (either Daniel or Bree's father) being sacrificed and immediately reborn.
Since then another thread focusing on the fictional Illuminati but containing many of the same LG15 references was added HERE. As you can see, the Illuminati, errr... I mean, the Order are not above faking someone's death.
I point these out because I think someone may find some useful info to create a theory or two with.
When you read through the threads you can see a lot of similarities to the LG15 story. So, I guess what I'm saying is - You're no crazier than I am!platypusrex256 wrote:crap thats a lot of info. it took me a while to see what you were getting at but thats for the tip.
so basicly you're saying that im not crazy? =)
Well, I don't necessarily think this is true of everyone. Many people change their theories once evidence comes forht that proves it unworkable, rather than try to force it to fit into their previous theories.luzdzus wrote:I have a theory about theories, which I guess would make it a metatheory.
Humans are time- and causality-oriented creatures. Our main means of survival is understanding how and why things happen so that we can cause them to happen when we want them to and prevent them from happening when we don't. As such, we are driven to try to understand anything and everything that crosses our path, to the point that we perceive patterns where they don't really exist. We hear music in raindrops hitting the ground, and see faces in clouds. We're most comfortable when we believe that we understand our environment and have a self-consistent set of explanations for what our senses are telling us. To steal a line from someone's sig here - "It's an anomaly, anomalies bug me". Being right or wrong are not as important as being consistent. Ultimately, this is what all philosophy boils down to - a search for a conceptual framework that includes the available facts.
Lg15 is a sort of Rorschach test writ in video. Everyone has to put together an interpretation which satisfies him- or herself, and find ways to make the facts fit into the theory. There are so many facts and so many loose ends which may be read ambiguously that no one will ever be able to tie up every line and camera shot into one grand unified theory that explains everything, so some of the information must be left pending, and this is where each person's individuality comes into play. Someone who believes the Illuminati, for instance, are behind everything will seize on anything that could conceivably point to them as vindication for his theory and leave the rest in abeyance until some other piece of information allows each piece to be explained as Illuminati-related. Ditto for aliens, rosicrucians, or any other explanation the individual may hold dear. In the end, each person's private interpretation of the experience is a reflection of the person rather than the experience itself. This, of course, is the very definition of gnosis.
Jumpin' Jezuz, that is not what I sat down to write. Oh, well. STET
It's just been bugging me for a long time lol, so I finally decided to post it.longlostposter wrote:Why was this thread resurrected at this particular point in time?