Balmung wrote:Lurker wrote:I know there's differences, Balmung. The very fact that there's usually different levels of certain chemicals in their bodies would almost necessitate that.
However, a number of other psychology and communications studies indicate the idea that - as you put it - "males are physical beings, and women are very emotional beings" (which isn't actually mutually exclusive; I'm just going with the way you phrased it; I know what you're trying to say, though) is a myth.
The hypothesis of many is that both are equally physical/emotional, but social expectations make us expect different behavior (and sometimes are successful at programming it). Obviously this theory is a lot more difficult to support with empirical research than the other, though.
Fair enough.
By the way, if you're interested in anything more about this (I don't want to make the whole thread be about differences and similarities in the sexes, but I think I should maybe mention this), see if you can find anything on the research done by Julia Wood and Kathryn Dindia, or a book written by them. Those are some of the more interesting statistics I've seen come out of studies on this.
I think their best guess was something like 1% of communication/interaction differences can be attributed without contest to sex (which is to say, all other variables being equal, there'd probably be this difference). There were some other fairly interesting findings on stuff like which sex has better verbal skills and which is more likely to be helpful to strangers (if I recall correctly, females edged out past the males by a small fraction in both categories). Another interesting thing was that while males are more likely to be involved in aggressive situations (verbal or physical), that applies to both the role of the aggressor and the receiver.
If you're at all interested in this kind of stuff, there's a lot out there that contests the traditional ideas about males and females, and it's really worth looking into.
sparkybennett wrote: Maybe the creators are making Jonas and Danny act like buffoons to help Bree seem more likeable. They must have been aware that people were responding to Jonas and DB more, and not liking Bree as much.
this drunkeness gives Bree more time to shine.
I think you may be right.
consideration wrote:Neither am I, but I've been to a few parties.
Yeah, but you made reference to it being Spring Break. I don't think that would factor in here, do you?
consideration wrote:I meant no harm, no foul about them being drunk on the street. If anything comes from that, we won't know until the next video, at least.
I understand that. I'm just saying they know harm and foul could easily come of it. I don't think they're acting very logically (or realistically). At the very least I can't see Jonas going along with all this so easily (he even suggested they go tequila drinking, according to Daniel in the Beast Chat section).
robtomorrow wrote:I was wondering if Jonas's teeshirt "it tastes like chicken" was in reference to the fish taco he had earlier.
Ha, nice. I wonder if Bree would take that as a compliment.