Lonelygirl15

colbertnationgirl wrote:

Cloud_ax wrote:

colbertnationgirl wrote: But I'm not going to die.

of course not

I better not.

colbertnationgirl wrote:

Cloud_ax wrote:

colbertnationgirl wrote: But I'm not going to die.

of course not

I better not.

As a measure, BMI became popular during the early 1980s as obesity started to become a discernible issue in prosperous Western society. BMI provided a simple numeric measure of a person's "fatness" or "thinness", allowing health professionals to discuss over- and under-weight problems more objectively with their patients. However, BMI has become controversial because many people, including physicians, have come to rely on its apparent numerical "authority" for medical diagnosis – but that has never been the BMI's purpose. It is meant to be used as a simple means of classifying sedentary (physically inactive) individuals with an average body composition.[1] For these individuals, the current value settings are as follows: a BMI of 18.5 to 25 may indicate optimal weight; a BMI lower than 18.5 suggests the person is underweight while a number above 25 may indicate the person is overweight; a BMI below 17.5 may indicate the person has anorexia or a related disorder; a number above 30 suggests the person is obese (over 40, morbidly obese).

Cloud_ax wrote:

colbertnationgirl wrote:

Cloud_ax wrote:of course not

I better not.

yeah you better not, cause if you die, i'll die

colbertnationgirl wrote:

As a measure, BMI became popular during the early 1980s as obesity started to become a discernible issue in prosperous Western society. BMI provided a simple numeric measure of a person's "fatness" or "thinness", allowing health professionals to discuss over- and under-weight problems more objectively with their patients. However, BMI has become controversial because many people, including physicians, have come to rely on its apparent numerical "authority" for medical diagnosis – but that has never been the BMI's purpose. It is meant to be used as a simple means of classifying sedentary (physically inactive) individuals with an average body composition.[1] For these individuals, the current value settings are as follows: a BMI of 18.5 to 25 may indicate optimal weight; a BMI lower than 18.5 suggests the person is underweight while a number above 25 may indicate the person is overweight; a BMI below 17.5 may indicate the person has anorexia or a related disorder; a number above 30 suggests the person is obese (over 40, morbidly obese).

Whaaaaaaaat?

colbertnationgirl wrote:

As a measure, BMI became popular during the early 1980s as obesity started to become a discernible issue in prosperous Western society. BMI provided a simple numeric measure of a person's "fatness" or "thinness", allowing health professionals to discuss over- and under-weight problems more objectively with their patients. However, BMI has become controversial because many people, including physicians, have come to rely on its apparent numerical "authority" for medical diagnosis – but that has never been the BMI's purpose. It is meant to be used as a simple means of classifying sedentary (physically inactive) individuals with an average body composition.[1] For these individuals, the current value settings are as follows: a BMI of 18.5 to 25 may indicate optimal weight; a BMI lower than 18.5 suggests the person is underweight while a number above 25 may indicate the person is overweight; a BMI below 17.5 may indicate the person has anorexia or a related disorder; a number above 30 suggests the person is obese (over 40, morbidly obese).

Whaaaaaaaat?

Jo_16_2 wrote:if you die, i'll slap you.

colbertnationgirl wrote:

Jo_16_2 wrote:if you die, i'll slap you.

So helpful, Jo.

Cloud_ax wrote:i dunno what that means

colbertnationgirl wrote:

Cloud_ax wrote:i dunno what that means

It means I'm apparently anorexic.

And on that note, I'm off to eat dinner. Be back in a bit.

colbertnationgirl wrote:

Cloud_ax wrote:i dunno what that means

It means I'm apparently anorexic.

And on that note, I'm off to eat dinner. Be back in a bit.