Lonelygirl15

Posted: **Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:25 pm**

Jo_16_2 wrote:
Chelseyrl wrote:BMI only measures your weight, height, and age. It doesn't take in anything else like your family history, how fast you digest food, or muscle. It's a flawed scale.
yeah it is, if a person has a lot of muscles, it's obviously heavy, but that doesnt mean that it's fat.

Exactamundo!

Posted: **Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:26 pm**

Chelseyrl wrote:
Jo_16_2 wrote:
Chelseyrl wrote:BMI only measures your weight, height, and age. It doesn't take in anything else like your family history, how fast you digest food, or muscle. It's a flawed scale.
yeah it is, if a person has a lot of muscles, it's obviously heavy, but that doesnt mean that it's fat.
Exactamundo!

Posted: **Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:26 pm**

According to the BMI, I'm overweight.

Posted: **Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:27 pm**

Chelseyrl wrote:BMI only measures your weight, height, and age. It doesn't take in anything else like your family history, how fast you digest food, or muscle. It's a flawed scale.

Ya, but I got a low BMI when I'm not that thin.

Posted: **Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:27 pm**

colbertnationgirl wrote:
Chelseyrl wrote:BMI only measures your weight, height, and age. It doesn't take in anything else like your family history, how fast you digest food, or muscle. It's a flawed scale.
Ya, but I got a low BMI when I'm not that thin.

You have a fast metabolism?

Posted: **Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:28 pm**

Chelseyrl wrote:
colbertnationgirl wrote:
Chelseyrl wrote:BMI only measures your weight, height, and age. It doesn't take in anything else like your family history, how fast you digest food, or muscle. It's a flawed scale.
Ya, but I got a low BMI when I'm not that thin.
You have a fast metabolism?

I guess.

Posted: **Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:28 pm**

Chelseyrl wrote:According to the BMI, I'm overweight.

no you're not.

Posted: **Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:28 pm**

meh a pair of jeans used to fit me 2 weeks ago, now they're kinda baggy.

Posted: **Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:29 pm**

I like this BMI calc better.

Posted: **Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:30 pm**

Chelseyrl wrote:I like this BMI calc better.

16.3

Posted: **Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:32 pm**

A 17 year and 1 months old (male) child
who is 147 pounds
and is 5 feet and 9 inches tall has
a body mass index of 21.8,

which is at the 56th percentile,

and would indicate that your child is at a healthy weight. Keep in mind that it is still possible for a child to have an eating disorder even if they are at a healthy weight though.

yay

Posted: **Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:33 pm**

A 16 year and 11 months old (female) child who is 110 pounds and is 5 feet and 9 inches tall has a body mass index of 16.3, which is below the 5th percentile, and would indicate that your child is underweight.

Your child's ideal body weight would be at a BMI at the 5th percentile or above, and so would be at least 116 pounds.

Oh, well that's not bad.

Posted: **Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:34 pm**

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-gi4Nt_xxg

Posted: **Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:35 pm**

colbertnationgirl wrote:
A 16 year and 11 months old (female) child who is 110 pounds and is 5 feet and 9 inches tall has a body mass index of 16.3, which is below the 5th percentile, and would indicate that your child is underweight.

Your child's ideal body weight would be at a BMI at the 5th percentile or above, and so would be at least 116 pounds.
Oh, well that's not bad.

110 pounds???
i can lift you so easilly.

Posted: **Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:35 pm**

colbertnationgirl wrote:
A 16 year and 11 months old (female) child who is 110 pounds and is 5 feet and 9 inches tall has a body mass index of 16.3, which is below the 5th percentile, and would indicate that your child is underweight.

Your child's ideal body weight would be at a BMI at the 5th percentile or above, and so would be at least 116 pounds.
Oh, well that's not bad.

gain six silleh pounds if you're that worried about it.

And btw, Jackson wasn't mad. Pachaw. He just responded.

Lonelygirl15

[Archive V] Daniel, ma belle