Lonelygirl15

I completely appoligise if it is the Answers but there are a few things that do not make sense if it is,
1) The vase/woman
2) Why was it scanned?
3) Why is there another column of apparently cut off text?

blugh wrote:yea i agree... i am lookin through google for vases

I was thinking it was an urn, like for ashes or something. Been looking through google too.

I don't think this image is likely to be useful: anyway the blue channel was complete crap, the red channel had a huge amount of crap (i.e. someone said there was a 21: it was a scratch on the red channel) and a photoshopped and blurred circle on it, the remaining green channel was so poorly contrasted that i had to ultra-level it in photoshop to let something come out. The result is almost useless but seems better than what i've seen yet, i hope someone can find this useful, at least to doublecheck the anagrams once they're solved:
http://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m200 ... hannel.jpg

No use whatsover post: The 'title' of the third paragraph looks scarily like "Hell"

Kain wrote:I completely appoligise if it is the Answers but there are a few things that do not make sense if it is,
1) The vase/woman
2) Why was it scanned?
3) Why is there another column of apparently cut off text?

1) I don't know either, your guess is as good as mine... maybe the images are not connected though.
2) Why do you say it was scanned?
3) Because she hasn't released two of those poems yet (and we have still yet to solve "WHERE"), if we did clear up the image so it was of much use, it would be too easy.

mj2006 wrote:

blugh wrote:yea i agree... i am lookin through google for vases

I was thinking it was an urn, like for ashes or something. Been looking through google too.

How about a friggin chalice

Kain wrote:No use whatsover post: The 'title' of the third paragraph looks scarily like "Hell"

I think it's WHY, but i could be well wrong.

EmilyElle wrote: 1) I don't know either, your guess is as good as mine... maybe the images are not connected though.
2) Why do you say it was scanned?
3) Because she hasn't released two of those poems yet (and we have still yet to solve "WHERE"), if we did clear up the image so it was of much use, it would be too easy.

Makes a lot of sense. I hope somone figures it out soon or we get another hint because out of all of the clues this is the one that has really caught my eye.

Kimberlee wrote:First time posting but here is my try...

http://i9.tinypic.com/490fj89.png

Kimberly, I can clearly see "tell me tell me tell" in the fist line of your image, which is the first part of the "who" solved poem.

I dont think its a chalice, most of the ones on google has no handles.

i dont have photo shop...but maybe if you take the cut off section kick transparency up so you can over lay it over the full paragraphs and see if it fills holes or completes letters??? just a thought

skingraph666 wrote:i dont have photo shop...but maybe if you take the cut off section kick transparency up so you can over lay it over the full paragraphs and see if it fills holes or completes letters??? just a thought

That's what I was thinking, overlay the letters... see what matches up.

have you guys looked to see if there are any letter patterns to the font she used on her very first pink poem?

I think it's a girl...

skingraph666 wrote:i dont have photo shop...but maybe if you take the cut off section kick transparency up so you can over lay it over the full paragraphs and see if it fills holes or completes letters??? just a thought

i tried that but it was difficult with the letterspacing of the fonts, and the 'jaggedness' (Sorry for the lack of better word, it's getting late) of the pictures text.

But i'm sure it would be possible if the person had more time.