I appreicate the early kind words, though I must disagree that I was trying to tease people with my knowledge. I learned, through channels I must keep confidential, that Jonas is canon early on. I was so distraut over that, because I feel his scripting is far inferior to anything the Creators do and feel he lowers LG standards, that I came and warned people in a vain hope that the Creators might not incorporate him, esp. if a wider protest movement arose. That didn't came to pass, but beyond that I was not trying to make people believe me. I stated that he was going to be canon quite a few times, but never chided anyone who thought he wasn't- because in a way I agreed with them, he was not of the quality to actually be something in the Breeniverse (he's clearly written by one of those other writer teams that was alluded to in an article). So, that was that, but I never wanted to force people to think my way.Languorous Lass wrote: HyeMew, I generally respect you a great deal, but it bothers me that you've posted a message that says essentially, "I know something, but I'm not going to tell." It doesn't add anything to the discussion, IMHO, except remind us that you're a mod and you have inside information.
That said, I do understand your point, because as an early LG investigator I always warned people against the many random people who would drop by with random clues about Bree, which of course were always false, people just trying to trick us or throw the investigation off. I was very wary of that kind of thing. While of course those people were never moderators nor well-established phorum posters doing that, I do understand the wariness and am sorry if I offended anyone by my recent postings.
(It has come to my attention that there have been "numerous" complaints lodged against me lately, however seeing as they would not reveal the actual number it could be 3 or 30. I don't know what to make of that.
But you are entitled to them 
without stooping to the use of terms that slander entire groups of people.
