Page 6 of 6

Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:16 pm
by itsmeforreal
TROUT

Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 2:31 am
by ixlr8
Kimmi-Chan wrote:http://www.cassieiswatching.com/?

now just has a math equation that equals 666

111(-96+99)!=666
111(-96+99)!=666 is not a math equation. It's another puzzle. Mathmatically, the equation equals 666, but the != means "not equal." Someone wouldn't go through the trouble to register a domain and set up a web page just to say that an equation that no one's ever seen before is wrong, while it is, in fact, correct. The question that remains, is what do these numbers mean? One thing I noticed is that all of those numbers are invertible, meaning, if you turn them upside down, they're still a number. (ie. 9=6, 6=9, 1=1). OR there could be some symbolism to the numbers (ie 111 could mean the three characters to this story, Daniel, Bree, Cassie).

Remember, people, the clues that are put out there are there intentionally by some very intelligent people. A lot of clues that either no one's talking about, or they simply haven't been picked up on. For example, in OpAphid's description of DO GO TO GOD, Cassie (for my helper), that's a palindrome, and so is every line thats written there? Likewise, that the first letter of each of the palindromes in the description is an anagram for the word "window?" I think we're just not thinking "outside the box" enough. Every tag, every description is placed there purposefully and has a meaning. The question is, what are they trying to tell us, and why are we not "getting it?"

I think we need to start a new thread and start from scratch, deconstruct our previously held ideas about this story and put everything back together again.

Mike

Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:06 am
by mikemakesright
ixlr8 wrote:Someone wouldn't go through the trouble to register a domain and set up a web page just to say that an equation that no one's ever seen before is wrong, while it is, in fact, correct.
either you read it one of two ways:

111(-96+99) != 666 which works out to 333 != 666

or

111(-96+99)! = 666 which works out to 666 = 666

The '!' in the second equation is the factorial operation. Either equation is correct in what it is claiming. So, I'm not sure what you meant.

Also, it's only like $5 to register a domain name, and it's not that much trouble if you are already running a site that you are hosting or paying for hosting. It really doesn't seem credible at all.

Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:33 pm
by ixlr8
mikemakesright wrote:
ixlr8 wrote:Someone wouldn't go through the trouble to register a domain and set up a web page just to say that an equation that no one's ever seen before is wrong, while it is, in fact, correct.
either you read it one of two ways:

111(-96+99) != 666 which works out to 333 != 666

or

111(-96+99)! = 666 which works out to 666 = 666

The '!' in the second equation is the factorial operation. Either equation is correct in what it is claiming. So, I'm not sure what you meant.

Also, it's only like $5 to register a domain name, and it's not that much trouble if you are already running a site that you are hosting or paying for hosting. It really doesn't seem credible at all.
But that doesn't answer the question of WHY is it there? Someone just being a game jacker? It's just not enough to be a gamejack. Someone being a smartass? Perhaps. But why -96 and 99 specifically? Why not 1+2? I think that there's some significance that we're missing. And what's the harm at exploring another avenue at the present moment? It's not like much is going on with Cassie anyway.

I'm convinced that the storytellers know what story they're telling. There has obviously been a lot of thought that has gone into this. It's too easy to write yourself into a corner. No one can pull a show like this off without having a REALLY solid game plan. The company that this is forming has a very solid business plan. The creators are weaving a story that we're getting sucked into, and they're going to make a boatload of money off of it. And kudos for them. I wish I had thought of it. But I digress.

Referring back to the MTV interview with Daniel. He obviously knows what's going on WELL ahead of time. He was asked what's coming up in the storyline, and he was very evasive. Most actors will at least give an interviewer something. Daniel had this look of "I know something you don't know" on his face, which caught my attention at first, but I dismissed it as unimportant. I'm sure that the creators are going to put in dead ends, as sure as I am that the creators are going to put in plants so that there is the proof of concept that it's "interactive." I'm going to write a post later about my theories on how interactive this show really is later. But I hope I've made my point that every alley IS worth exploring, no matter how inconsequential it may seem.

Mike

Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 9:33 pm
by blessedsophia
ixlr8 wrote:
mikemakesright wrote:
ixlr8 wrote:Someone wouldn't go through the trouble to register a domain and set up a web page just to say that an equation that no one's ever seen before is wrong, while it is, in fact, correct.
either you read it one of two ways:

111(-96+99) != 666 which works out to 333 != 666

or

111(-96+99)! = 666 which works out to 666 = 666

The '!' in the second equation is the factorial operation. Either equation is correct in what it is claiming. So, I'm not sure what you meant.

Also, it's only like $5 to register a domain name, and it's not that much trouble if you are already running a site that you are hosting or paying for hosting. It really doesn't seem credible at all.
But that doesn't answer the question of WHY is it there? Someone just being a game jacker? It's just not enough to be a gamejack. Someone being a smartass? Perhaps. But why -96 and 99 specifically? Why not 1+2? I think that there's some significance that we're missing. And what's the harm at exploring another avenue at the present moment? It's not like much is going on with Cassie anyway.

I'm convinced that the storytellers know what story they're telling. There has obviously been a lot of thought that has gone into this. It's too easy to write yourself into a corner. No one can pull a show like this off without having a REALLY solid game plan. The company that this is forming has a very solid business plan. The creators are weaving a story that we're getting sucked into, and they're going to make a boatload of money off of it. And kudos for them. I wish I had thought of it. But I digress.

Referring back to the MTV interview with Daniel. He obviously knows what's going on WELL ahead of time. He was asked what's coming up in the storyline, and he was very evasive. Most actors will at least give an interviewer something. Daniel had this look of "I know something you don't know" on his face, which caught my attention at first, but I dismissed it as unimportant. I'm sure that the creators are going to put in dead ends, as sure as I am that the creators are going to put in plants so that there is the proof of concept that it's "interactive." I'm going to write a post later about my theories on how interactive this show really is later. But I hope I've made my point that every alley IS worth exploring, no matter how inconsequential it may seem.

Mike
I took a glance at the page source, and it's totally blank (as anyone else who's looked can testify). I honestly doubt this is a true "gamejack" so much as somebody just screwing around with us to throw us off focus. Had there been anything else on that page--even a valid html header--I might've thought otherwise.

Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:02 pm
by starman
blessedsophia wrote:
ixlr8 wrote:
mikemakesright wrote:
ixlr8 wrote:Someone wouldn't go through the trouble to register a domain and set up a web page just to say that an equation that no one's ever seen before is wrong, while it is, in fact, correct.
either you read it one of two ways:

111(-96+99) != 666 which works out to 333 != 666

or

111(-96+99)! = 666 which works out to 666 = 666

The '!' in the second equation is the factorial operation. Either equation is correct in what it is claiming. So, I'm not sure what you meant.

Also, it's only like $5 to register a domain name, and it's not that much trouble if you are already running a site that you are hosting or paying for hosting. It really doesn't seem credible at all.
But that doesn't answer the question of WHY is it there? Someone just being a game jacker? It's just not enough to be a gamejack. Someone being a smartass? Perhaps. But why -96 and 99 specifically? Why not 1+2? I think that there's some significance that we're missing. And what's the harm at exploring another avenue at the present moment? It's not like much is going on with Cassie anyway.

I'm convinced that the storytellers know what story they're telling. There has obviously been a lot of thought that has gone into this. It's too easy to write yourself into a corner. No one can pull a show like this off without having a REALLY solid game plan. The company that this is forming has a very solid business plan. The creators are weaving a story that we're getting sucked into, and they're going to make a boatload of money off of it. And kudos for them. I wish I had thought of it. But I digress.

Referring back to the MTV interview with Daniel. He obviously knows what's going on WELL ahead of time. He was asked what's coming up in the storyline, and he was very evasive. Most actors will at least give an interviewer something. Daniel had this look of "I know something you don't know" on his face, which caught my attention at first, but I dismissed it as unimportant. I'm sure that the creators are going to put in dead ends, as sure as I am that the creators are going to put in plants so that there is the proof of concept that it's "interactive." I'm going to write a post later about my theories on how interactive this show really is later. But I hope I've made my point that every alley IS worth exploring, no matter how inconsequential it may seem.

Mike
I took a glance at the page source, and it's totally blank (as anyone else who's looked can testify). I honestly doubt this is a true "gamejack" so much as somebody just screwing around with us to throw us off focus. Had there been anything else on that page--even a valid html header--I might've thought otherwise.
If you look more closely, the complete page contains the following:

<html><head></head><body>111(-96+99)!=666

View the source (http://www.cassieiswatching.com/?), save the page to your desktop, and edit using Notepad and you will see the above.

Edit: and since the domain name was registered the day after the original CiW video was posted, it would lead one to believe it is a gamejack. If the people behind CiW are that smart, wouldn't they have registered the domain name before they posted the video?