Page 7 of 8
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:38 am
by tannhaus
Kasdeja wrote:Haven't you said enough? Drop it.
But but Kasdeja....yeah, we know we had his writings, letters to him and to others from him, the writings of his friends, their diaries, his diaries, and an extraordinary amount of information concerning him....
But since we really didn't know him OURSELVES...couldn't he possibly be an evil baby-sacrificing satanist? I mean, do we really KNOW? How can we be certain...
And for that matter, do we really know ourselves? I mean, we could be killing babies on an altar to Beelzebub while sleepwalking....and we would never know....
Frightening really...
hahahhhaa....I know, I know....feeding the trolls...bad bad
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:11 pm
by RelorAranel
sororyzbl wrote:aleksmakk wrote:Have we ever explored the possibility that Daniel is the target and Bree is the bait? Am I just loopy from thinking about this for so long?
Oh that's such a rip-off of Wicker Man, if it's true.
But the original right? Not the crap-shoot remake?
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:39 pm
by sororyzbl
RelorAranel wrote:sororyzbl wrote:aleksmakk wrote:Have we ever explored the possibility that Daniel is the target and Bree is the bait? Am I just loopy from thinking about this for so long?
Oh that's such a rip-off of Wicker Man, if it's true.
But the original right? Not the crap-shoot remake?
They remade Wicker Man?!
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:46 pm
by Kasdeja
They've also remade Texas Chainsaw Massacre for, like, the billionth time...
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:51 pm
by tigerlilylynn
sororyzbl wrote:RelorAranel wrote:sororyzbl wrote:
Oh that's such a rip-off of Wicker Man, if it's true.
But the original right? Not the crap-shoot remake?
They remade Wicker Man?!
With Nicolas Cage no less.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 2:34 pm
by Nora Volkova
sororyzbl wrote:RelorAranel wrote:sororyzbl wrote:
Oh that's such a rip-off of Wicker Man, if it's true.
But the original right? Not the crap-shoot remake?
They remade Wicker Man?!
Do not got see it! It's like... like... looking at pictures of Courtney Peldon and Bai Ling on
http://www.gofugyourself.com without using adequate eye protection. It's like figuring, "Oh, Stepford Wives remake -- Nicole Kidman, Glenn Close, Matthew Broderick, Christopher Walken -- that's a shoe-in to be great....."
Painful. And. Traumatic.
you have been warned. trust me, you would rather be a virgin sacrifice than see this remake.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 2:42 pm
by Kasdeja
So it's even more terrifying than the thought of Paris Hilton in House of Wax?
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:28 pm
by sororyzbl
Nora Volkova wrote:
Do not got see it! It's like... like... looking at pictures of Courtney Peldon and Bai Ling on
http://www.gofugyourself.com without using adequate eye protection. It's like figuring, "Oh, Stepford Wives remake -- Nicole Kidman, Glenn Close, Matthew Broderick, Christopher Walken -- that's a shoe-in to be great....."
Painful. And. Traumatic.
you have been warned. trust me, you would rather be a virgin sacrifice than see this remake.
I actually knew about the remake, I just tried to put it out of my head. My company has a theatre, and it happens to be right across the atrium from my office. I was tempted for like 3 days to see it, but I apo pantos kakadaimonos'd that shit. I mean... it's wicker man. you can't top the original.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:59 pm
by spaciegirlreturn
tannhaus wrote:Kasdeja wrote:Haven't you said enough? Drop it.
But but Kasdeja....yeah, we know we had his writings, letters to him and to others from him, the writings of his friends, their diaries, his diaries, and an extraordinary amount of information concerning him....
But since we really didn't know him OURSELVES...couldn't he possibly be an evil baby-sacrificing satanist? I mean, do we really KNOW? How can we be certain...
And for that matter, do we really know ourselves? I mean, we could be killing babies on an altar to Beelzebub while sleepwalking....and we would never know....
Frightening really...
hahahhhaa....I know, I know....feeding the trolls...bad bad
Yeah, I think it's clear..that's exactly what I meant. You're a genius.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 6:58 pm
by mousegirl
Dan really cares about Bree, it is sooo cute
I hope he can get to her on time
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:36 pm
by truestory
Anyone think that the girl kidnapped in Arizona was Bree's mom? Then when Aleister took off for England he took her too? Hence why Brees mom met her dad in England?
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:39 pm
by Sfonzarelli
truestory wrote:Anyone think that the girl kidnapped in Arizona was Bree's mom? Then when Aleister took off for England he took her too? Hence why Brees mom met her dad in England?
Someone already posted that, the dates don't add up.
Could be her grandma.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:49 pm
by truestory
Sfonzarelli wrote:truestory wrote:Anyone think that the girl kidnapped in Arizona was Bree's mom? Then when Aleister took off for England he took her too? Hence why Brees mom met her dad in England?
Someone already posted that, the dates don't add up.
Could be her grandma.
Yea that was my only problem thinking about that idea.
Maybe, where was Bree's mom born?
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:56 pm
by Sfonzarelli
truestory wrote:Sfonzarelli wrote:truestory wrote:Anyone think that the girl kidnapped in Arizona was Bree's mom? Then when Aleister took off for England he took her too? Hence why Brees mom met her dad in England?
Someone already posted that, the dates don't add up.
Could be her grandma.
Yea that was my only problem thinking about that idea.
Maybe, where was Bree's mom born?
All we know about Bree's parents was that they both went to Oxford in the 60s and Bree's mom was 21 at the time.
...I think, I could be getting this wrong.
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 1:20 am
by samanthe
Well, Daniel never said the age of the girl who was kidnapped. If Bree's mom was around 20 in 1960, she would have been born in 1940 or so? Maybe as a little girl she was taken?
But yes, the article Daniel mentions is fake, guys. Keep that in mind. This is a story, remember?