Lonelygirl15

Kasdeja wrote:Haven't you said enough? Drop it.

But but Kasdeja....yeah, we know we had his writings, letters to him and to others from him, the writings of his friends, their diaries, his diaries, and an extraordinary amount of information concerning him....

But since we really didn't know him OURSELVES...couldn't he possibly be an evil baby-sacrificing satanist? I mean, do we really KNOW? How can we be certain...

And for that matter, do we really know ourselves? I mean, we could be killing babies on an altar to Beelzebub while sleepwalking....and we would never know....

Frightening really...

hahahhhaa....I know, I know....feeding the trolls...bad bad

sororyzbl wrote:

aleksmakk wrote:Have we ever explored the possibility that Daniel is the target and Bree is the bait? Am I just loopy from thinking about this for so long?

Oh that's such a rip-off of Wicker Man, if it's true.

But the original right? Not the crap-shoot remake?

RelorAranel wrote:

sororyzbl wrote:

aleksmakk wrote:Have we ever explored the possibility that Daniel is the target and Bree is the bait? Am I just loopy from thinking about this for so long?

Oh that's such a rip-off of Wicker Man, if it's true.

But the original right? Not the crap-shoot remake?

They remade Wicker Man?!

They've also remade Texas Chainsaw Massacre for, like, the billionth time...

sororyzbl wrote:

RelorAranel wrote:

sororyzbl wrote:

aleksmakk wrote:Have we ever explored the possibility that Daniel is the target and Bree is the bait? Am I just loopy from thinking about this for so long?

Oh that's such a rip-off of Wicker Man, if it's true.

But the original right? Not the crap-shoot remake?

They remade Wicker Man?!

With Nicolas Cage no less.

sororyzbl wrote:

RelorAranel wrote:

sororyzbl wrote:

aleksmakk wrote:Have we ever explored the possibility that Daniel is the target and Bree is the bait? Am I just loopy from thinking about this for so long?

Oh that's such a rip-off of Wicker Man, if it's true.

But the original right? Not the crap-shoot remake?

They remade Wicker Man?!

Do not got see it! It's like... like... looking at pictures of Courtney Peldon and Bai Ling on http://www.gofugyourself.com without using adequate eye protection. It's like figuring, "Oh, Stepford Wives remake -- Nicole Kidman, Glenn Close, Matthew Broderick, Christopher Walken -- that's a shoe-in to be great....."

Painful. And. Traumatic.

you have been warned. trust me, you would rather be a virgin sacrifice than see this remake.

So it's even more terrifying than the thought of Paris Hilton in House of Wax?

Nora Volkova wrote: Do not got see it! It's like... like... looking at pictures of Courtney Peldon and Bai Ling on http://www.gofugyourself.com without using adequate eye protection. It's like figuring, "Oh, Stepford Wives remake -- Nicole Kidman, Glenn Close, Matthew Broderick, Christopher Walken -- that's a shoe-in to be great....."

Painful. And. Traumatic.

you have been warned. trust me, you would rather be a virgin sacrifice than see this remake.

I actually knew about the remake, I just tried to put it out of my head. My company has a theatre, and it happens to be right across the atrium from my office. I was tempted for like 3 days to see it, but I apo pantos kakadaimonos'd that shit. I mean... it's wicker man. you can't top the original.

tannhaus wrote:

Kasdeja wrote:Haven't you said enough? Drop it.

But but Kasdeja....yeah, we know we had his writings, letters to him and to others from him, the writings of his friends, their diaries, his diaries, and an extraordinary amount of information concerning him....

But since we really didn't know him OURSELVES...couldn't he possibly be an evil baby-sacrificing satanist? I mean, do we really KNOW? How can we be certain...

And for that matter, do we really know ourselves? I mean, we could be killing babies on an altar to Beelzebub while sleepwalking....and we would never know....

Frightening really...

hahahhhaa....I know, I know....feeding the trolls...bad bad

Yeah, I think it's clear..that's exactly what I meant. You're a genius.

Dan really cares about Bree, it is sooo cute
I hope he can get to her on time

Anyone think that the girl kidnapped in Arizona was Bree's mom? Then when Aleister took off for England he took her too? Hence why Brees mom met her dad in England?

truestory wrote:Anyone think that the girl kidnapped in Arizona was Bree's mom? Then when Aleister took off for England he took her too? Hence why Brees mom met her dad in England?

Someone already posted that, the dates don't add up.

Could be her grandma.

Sfonzarelli wrote:

truestory wrote:Anyone think that the girl kidnapped in Arizona was Bree's mom? Then when Aleister took off for England he took her too? Hence why Brees mom met her dad in England?

Someone already posted that, the dates don't add up.

Could be her grandma.

Yea that was my only problem thinking about that idea.
Maybe, where was Bree's mom born?

truestory wrote:

Sfonzarelli wrote:

truestory wrote:Anyone think that the girl kidnapped in Arizona was Bree's mom? Then when Aleister took off for England he took her too? Hence why Brees mom met her dad in England?

Someone already posted that, the dates don't add up.

Could be her grandma.

Yea that was my only problem thinking about that idea.
Maybe, where was Bree's mom born?

All we know about Bree's parents was that they both went to Oxford in the 60s and Bree's mom was 21 at the time.

...I think, I could be getting this wrong.

Well, Daniel never said the age of the girl who was kidnapped. If Bree's mom was around 20 in 1960, she would have been born in 1940 or so? Maybe as a little girl she was taken?

But yes, the article Daniel mentions is fake, guys. Keep that in mind. This is a story, remember?