Page 1 of 2

[Solve] Interpretation of "When"

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:35 am
by mLe
Please place interpretations of the 'When' anagram here.

WHEN:
ELEVEN DAYS UNTIL MY FATE
MEETS ME JUST INSIDE THE GATE
NOT MUCH TIME FOR YOU TO TRAIN
STILL YOU BICKER AND COMPLAIN.
HE'LL TAKE IT WITH A SINGLE PHRASE:
ELEVEN DAYS, ELEVEN DAYS

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:36 am
by Luv2Luvem
October 12th yeah?

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:38 am
by mLe
October 12, when her fate will meet her inside the gate?

I didn't pick up any of the drops (seeing as they're thousands of miles away) Is there a gate in that park? is 'gate' a symbolic thing, like, the beginning?

Edit: IMHO i think that the 'gate' line and the 'phrase' line are the two most important parts of this poem. I also think that there must be clues to them in the pictures posted or in the previous vids...

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:52 am
by randomtrickpony
I think she is referring to the bickering we so often do with each other on this board. I mean, we don't all do it, but a lot does go on because people interpret what someone said the wrong way...I think the overall meaning is, once again...work together.

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:54 am
by Sfonzarelli
NOT MUCH TIME FOR YOU TO TRAIN
STILL YOU BICKER AND COMPLAIN.
These lines bother me. The second person keeps switching around. In "not much time for you to train", the 2nd person seems to refer to Bree. (She's been training all this time) But Bree hasn't been bickering and complaining about it. "You" in that line seems to refer to us. Unless we're supposed to be reading John Dee and doing hatha yoga too.

Edit: Oh, wait, nevermind, Bree did complain a little.

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:55 am
by mLe
"He'll take it with a single phrase" really bothers me, there must be something to that...

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:55 am
by Luv2Luvem
randomtrickpony wrote:I think she is referring to the bickering we so often do with each other on this board. I mean, we don't all do it, but a lot does go on because people interpret what someone said the wrong way...I think the overall meaning is, once again...work together.
I agree, that's why I was so adamant that "The house Divided" in the last poem was US. :wink:

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:56 am
by randomtrickpony
Yes, she complained quite a bit about memorization and the like.

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:57 am
by Luv2Luvem
Sfonzarelli wrote:
NOT MUCH TIME FOR YOU TO TRAIN
STILL YOU BICKER AND COMPLAIN.
These lines bother me. The second person keeps switching around. In "not much time for you to train", the 2nd person seems to refer to Bree. (She's been training all this time) But Bree hasn't been bickering and complaining about it. "You" in that line seems to refer to us. Unless we're supposed to be reading John Dee and doing hatha yoga too.

Edit: Oh, wait, nevermind, Bree did complain a little.
I was thinking that there's not much time for US to train....as in get ready.

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 am
by randomtrickpony
Luv2Luvem wrote:
randomtrickpony wrote:I think she is referring to the bickering we so often do with each other on this board. I mean, we don't all do it, but a lot does go on because people interpret what someone said the wrong way...I think the overall meaning is, once again...work together.
I agree, that's why I was so adamant that "The house Divided" in the last poem was US. :wink:

Oddly enough...though I never posted my poem summary...that's what I thought to.

Being an english minor...the tense changes she has created so far make me think she's not one person...

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:05 am
by toadlguy
The tenses are wierd everywhere. In the WHAT she's talking in the third person but in WHEN she says:

ELEVEN DAYS UNTIL MY FATE
MEETS ME JUST INSIDE THE GATE

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:08 am
by Sfonzarelli
toadlguy wrote:The tenses are wierd everywhere. In the WHAT she's talking in the third person but in WHEN she says:

ELEVEN DAYS UNTIL MY FATE
MEETS ME JUST INSIDE THE GATE
Lends credibility to Bree and Cassie being the same person

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:14 am
by randomtrickpony
Could it be, then, that the person who dropped the bag off the cliff was Bree...possessed by Cassie...? In which case the tense changes would work, if we figure this.

That always kinda bothered me, because ghosts can't move things like that on their own.

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:16 am
by bubbajay424
We don't know that cassie isn't dead, and there are strong arguments that she is alive.

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:17 am
by skingraph666
possesion hmm??...well then she could posses bree and help her...maybe cassie's fate will be sealed with the cerimony and she will burn in hell???