Page 1 of 1

[ANALYSIS] New Gemma Video 11-28-06

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:33 pm
by Ziola
[Panda Edit -- I know you guys hate when I do this, but I changed the thread name. You all should make as many threads as your little hearts desire, but please be more descriptive and broad in your subjects. If you want to discuss an aspect of the Gemma video, make a thread for the WHOLE video so as to save space and make things less cluttered. Muah!]

but in her new video Gemma says that she thinks that she's being watched. I'm of the opinion that perhaps our little friend Warpylol is keeping an eye on her, so nothing happens to her (after all, Tach has proven she's a loose cannon :smt066 ).

What do you think?

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:35 pm
by Killthesmiley
i agree

Re: [ANALYSIS] New Gemma Video 11-28-06

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 2:27 pm
by Ziola
Ziola wrote:[Panda Edit -- I know you guys hate when I do this, but I changed the thread name. You all should make as many threads as your little hearts desire, but please be more descriptive and broad in your subjects. If you want to discuss an aspect of the Gemma video, make a thread for the WHOLE video so as to save space and make things less cluttered. Muah!]

but in her new video Gemma says that she thinks that she's being watched. I'm of the opinion that perhaps our little friend Warpylol is keeping an eye on her, so nothing happens to her (after all, Tach has proven she's a loose cannon :smt066 ).

What do you think?
If you follow behind me trying to clean up my mess, we could be here a while. Actually, you probably should, since I never know what the hell I'm doing. I don't know how many times I've tried to post a topic and forgotten the damn subject heading :lol:

Re: [ANALYSIS] New Gemma Video 11-28-06

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 3:24 pm
by Sad Panda
Ziola wrote:
If you follow behind me trying to clean up my mess, we could be here a while. Actually, you probably should, since I never know what the hell I'm doing. I don't know how many times I've tried to post a topic and forgotten the damn subject heading :lol:
Eh, don't worry about it. It's what I'm here for. 8)

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 4:02 pm
by insideup
Perhaps Warpylol is keeping an eye on her so she isn't able to relay more information to Bree than OpAphid wants her to.

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 7:55 pm
by Anne
The fact that Gemma now has a "sitter" obviously means that she is being considered as much a threat as Tach and the rest. What might be interesting also is to try and think what set Op off enough to make her send a sitter all the way to England...

OR
I just thought of this - one of the hints in the last drop said something about being "in flight"... maybe that has something to do with sending a sitter to watch Gemma?

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 12:10 am
by tiltingwindward
Am I allowed to say that Gemma is even denser than Bree if she hasn't figured out yet that helping B&D might make her a target? Geez.

I would be surprised if Gemma wasn't being watched...the question is, why is she being allowed to continue to assist the runaways?

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 1:32 am
by insideup
I don't think OpAphid wants to harm Daniel and Bree. It seems more likely to assume that Op is "keeping an eye on them" instead.

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 1:33 am
by stuart2004
tiltingwindward wrote:Am I allowed to say that Gemma is even denser than Bree if she hasn't figured out yet that helping B&D might make her a target? Geez.

I would be surprised if Gemma wasn't being watched...the question is, why is she being allowed to continue to assist the runaways?
she really hasnt done anything to assist them...............she just tells them that hey I say a hand in your vid....