Page 1 of 2
					
				franchise? choose your own adventure?
				Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 11:35 pm
				by bubbleteagirl
				I'm not sure if it's been talked about yet, but...
What if all the "LG15 quality" "new girls" popping up have been created by the LG15 creators? Either in an LG15 franchise sort of way or in a way that whichever one we respond the most positively too will become the official "new girl" and the others will be dropped.
Interesting possibility... eh? What do other people think?
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 1:09 am
				by london
				I definitely agree with that. I was thinking the exact same thing. ALL of these new girls popping up with very Creator-like video qualities... TOO suspicious to all be happening within a few days of one another. I think you're right... that whoever the viewers respond to the most positively will be the new girl. Although, I have thought that perhaps they'll choose who we like the least (which I think seems to be Jules, by far) and maybe sacrifice them or something. I don't know... it's probably been brought up before, but it's just a theory. Personally I think soccerstar is the new character. Subscribed to her right away as soon as I saw her video because it was just TOO LG15-like that it HAD to be related. HAD to be.
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 1:16 am
				by trainer101
				In case folks missed it, there's a "Video Challenge" going on right now. 
CLICK HERE!
Some of these "new girls" are your friends here on the forum - the trick is to figure out which ones.  
 
 
Be gentle with all of them - they are not professional actresses - they are 
US.
 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:22 am
				by bubbleteagirl
				trainer101 wrote:In case folks missed it, there's a "Video Challenge" going on right now. 
CLICK HERE!
Some of these "new girls" are your friends here on the forum - the trick is to figure out which ones.  
 
 
Be gentle with all of them - they are not professional actresses - they are 
US.
 
Oh cool!!! That's so awesome! If I had a much better camera and I hadn't already posted about a hundred lame video responses I would have totally asked for a script.
 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:34 am
				by nowherepixie
				bubbleteagirl wrote:trainer101 wrote:In case folks missed it, there's a "Video Challenge" going on right now. 
CLICK HERE!
Some of these "new girls" are your friends here on the forum - the trick is to figure out which ones.  
 
 
Be gentle with all of them - they are not professional actresses - they are 
US.
 
Oh cool!!! That's so awesome! If I had a much better camera and I hadn't already posted about a hundred lame video responses I would have totally asked for a script.
 
Do it for a laugh anyway? I've seen your vids I reckon you'd be good at it!
 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:48 am
				by trainer101
				nowherepixie wrote:bubbleteagirl wrote:trainer101 wrote:In case folks missed it, there's a "Video Challenge" going on right now. 
CLICK HERE!
Some of these "new girls" are your friends here on the forum - the trick is to figure out which ones.  
 
 
Be gentle with all of them - they are not professional actresses - they are 
US.
 
Oh cool!!! That's so awesome! If I had a much better camera and I hadn't already posted about a hundred lame video responses I would have totally asked for a script.
 
Do it for a laugh anyway? I've seen your vids I reckon you'd be good at it!
 
Yes! You could be bubbleteanewgirl!  

 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:51 am
				by nowherepixie
				trainer101 wrote:nowherepixie wrote:bubbleteagirl wrote:
Oh cool!!! That's so awesome! If I had a much better camera and I hadn't already posted about a hundred lame video responses I would have totally asked for a script.
Do it for a laugh anyway? I've seen your vids I reckon you'd be good at it!
 
Yes! You could be bubbleteanewgirl!  

 
*prod*
Dooooo iiiiiiiit! 

 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 12:01 am
				by london
				nowherepixie wrote:trainer101 wrote:nowherepixie wrote:
Do it for a laugh anyway? I've seen your vids I reckon you'd be good at it!
Yes! You could be bubbleteanewgirl!  

 
*prod*
Dooooo iiiiiiiit! 

 
Yes!!! DOOOOO ITTTT!!! 

 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:13 am
				by voyboy
				london wrote:nowherepixie wrote:trainer101 wrote:Yes! You could be bubbleteanewgirl!  

 
*prod*
Dooooo iiiiiiiit! 

 
Yes!!! DOOOOO ITTTT!!! 

 
it would be odd if you 
didnt participate in this!!
 
			
					
				So then do we get to vote?
				Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:08 pm
				by DoubleG
				I vote Maddison Atkins as the new girl; Jules and Tayler are too boring and unrealistic.  Which is sad, because I thought Jules had some potential.  Maddison is at least interesting.
I really think they ought to just make everyone's "dream girl," like Bree, but maxxed out in every way, and then have her "sacrificed" in the ceremony once everyone's become attached to her.
What does everyone think?
			 
			
					
				Re: So then do we get to vote?
				Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:38 pm
				by Linc
				DoubleG wrote:I vote Maddison Atkins as the new girl; Jules and Tayler are too boring and unrealistic.  Which is sad, because I thought Jules had some potential.  Maddison is at least interesting.
I really think they ought to just make everyone's "dream girl," like Bree, but maxxed out in every way, and then have her "sacrificed" in the ceremony once everyone's become attached to her.
What does everyone think?
It would require a major plot twist - and a lot of work to keep it from being unrealistic - for Maddison. 
Plus, that's a lot of ARG material that people would have to sift through and understand - or at least have explained to them soon - for this to work.
 
			
					
				Re: So then do we get to vote?
				Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 6:12 pm
				by DoubleG
				Linc wrote:DoubleG wrote:I vote Maddison Atkins as the new girl; Jules and Tayler are too boring and unrealistic.  Which is sad, because I thought Jules had some potential.  Maddison is at least interesting.
I really think they ought to just make everyone's "dream girl," like Bree, but maxxed out in every way, and then have her "sacrificed" in the ceremony once everyone's become attached to her.
What does everyone think?
It would require a major plot twist - and a lot of work to keep it from being unrealistic - for Maddison. 
Plus, that's a lot of ARG material that people would have to sift through and understand - or at least have explained to them soon - for this to work.
 
I don't know... if you think of "Mr. Zipp" as Bree's mom, her whole story seems like it could work.  Maddison seems to explain herself far better than most of the already canonized ARG stuff.
Actually, I'd rather see the Creators bring Gemma back, or do a "surprise canonization" of itscassie like they did with Nikki Bower. (with Cassie as the "new girl")  That's my REAL vote!
They are doing a much better job at keeping us guessing than they did before with Gemma and Jonas this time.
 
			
					
				
				Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 6:36 pm
				by Susan
				DoubleG wrote:They are doing a much better job at keeping us guessing than they did before with Gemma and Jonas this time.
  I wasn't there for the Jonas or Gemma linkup, but it must have been really awful to out stupid this one.
Story Line:
     
Bree:  I think it's Jules
     
Everyone Else:  No, it's not Jules
     
Bree:  I'm pretty sure it's Jules.  I'm relying on your opinion.
     
Everyone Else:  No, It's not Jules and here is why... (half hour of brilliant deduction later) ...so you see, there is no way it can be Jules
     
Bree:  So I'm thinking it's Jules...
 
			
					
				
				Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 6:51 pm
				by trainer101
				Susan wrote:DoubleG wrote:They are doing a much better job at keeping us guessing than they did before with Gemma and Jonas this time.
  I wasn't there for the Jonas or Gemma linkup, but it must have been really awful to out stupid this one.
Story Line:
     
Bree:  I think it's Jules
     
Everyone Else:  No, it's not Jules
     
Bree:  I'm pretty sure it's Jules.  I'm relying on your opinion.
     
Everyone Else:  No, It's not Jules and here is why... (half hour of brilliant deduction later) ...so you see, there is no way it can be Jules
     
Bree:  So I'm thinking it's Jules...
 
This is the part I've been struggling with the most. In the past, the clues have been much more subtle - going back to the Crowley photo and even up to Alex being revealed as an Orderite. They've never introduced a new character, plotline or clue by smacking us in face with it. Something just doesn't seem right.
 
			
					
				Re: So then do we get to vote?
				Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:21 pm
				by Lurker
				DoubleG wrote:I really think they ought to just make everyone's "dream girl," like Bree, but maxxed out in every way, and then have her "sacrificed" in the ceremony once everyone's become attached to her.
What does everyone think?
I think the designation of Bree as a "dream girl" only applies if we're talking about nightmares. Maybe even night terrors.
Oh, you were asking something else. My bad.
I think that if they wanted to go for that kind of affect, they could just go ahead and use Bree. Why try to clone her (narratively speaking)? It's just going to make both characters less valuable, and I doubt a majority would ever become attached enough to the clone anyway (there'd be constant comparisions between them).